← Search

Stephanie Thompson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chicago, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
306 matches · 147W–159L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history306 matches
L
2026-11-01 · NITA E 40W40d TAM-Lobo Corey · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Kalina
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-5
L
2026-10-25 · NITA E 40W40d TAM-Lobo Corey · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly O'Donnell
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-17 · CHI E 40W4.0 8.Tam Corey Sun 11 $25 · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-5
L
2026-10-04 · CHI E 18W4.0 7.ACN Bergman Sun 5 $24 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Illana Hodges
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-27 · CHI F CW8.5 3.Wilm Thompson Sun 11 $22 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Heather Stenmark
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-13 · CHI E 40W4.0 8.Tam Corey Sun 11 $25 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erica Eisner
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-02 · #1 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · NITA S 40W40g TAM-Lobo-Corey · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angela Hanson
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-12 · NITA S 40W40g TAM-Lobo-Corey · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pauline Camacho
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-28 · CDTA S 40&OW4.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 11 $22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lesley Bantle
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-27 · NITA S 40W40g TAM-Lobo-Corey · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Beu
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-17 · CDTA S ComboW8.5 2.Wilm Thompson Sun 11 $22 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Julie Weidner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams95 teams · 2019–2027
CHI E 18W4.0 7.ACN Bergman Sun 5 $24
ESL 18 & Over · Women 4.0 · 18+
2027
CHI E 40W4.0 8.Tam Corey Sun 11 $25
ESL 40 & Over · Women 4.0 · 40+
2027
NITA E 40W40d TAM-Lobo Corey
2027 NITA1 ESL Adult 40 & Over · NITA ESL 40 & Over 4.0 Women · 40+
2027
CDTA E 18&OW4.0 4Nielsen Bergman Sun 5 $22
CDTA ESL 18 & Over · CDTA E 18&O Women 4.0 · 18+
2026
CDTA E 40&OW4.0 2Tam Corey Sun 11 $22
CDTA ESL 40 & Over · CDTA E 40&O Women 4.0 · 40+
2026
CDTA S 40&OW4.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 11 $22
1Summer 40&O WN/WE · Women 4.0 · 40+
2026
CDTA S ComboW7.5 2.Tam Corey Fri 7 $22
1Summer Combo WN/WE · Women 7.5
2026
CDTA S ComboW8.5 2.Wilm Thompson Sun 11 $22
1Summer Combo WN/WE · Women 8.5
2026
CDTA W 18&OW4.0 9.Nielsen Bergman Sun 5 $22
CDTA 1Winter 18 & Over W/E · CDTA 18 & Over W 4.0 Winter · 18+
2026
CDTA W 40&OW4.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 11 $22
CDTA 1Winter 40 & Over W/E · CDTA 40 & Over W 4.0 Winter · 40+
2026
CDTA W 40&OW4.5 4.Wlmt Burns Sat 5 $20
CDTA 1Winter 40 & Over W/E · CDTA 40 & Over W 4.5 Winter · 40+
2026
CDTA W ComboW7.5 2.Tam Corey Fri 7:30 $22
CDTA 1Winter Combo · CDTA Combo W 7.5 Winter
2026
CDTA W ComboW8.5 1.Wlmt Thompson Sun 11 $22
CDTA 1Winter Combo · CDTA Combo W 8.5 Winter
2026
CHI F CW8.5 3.Wilm Thompson Sun 11 $22
Fall Combo · Women 8.5
2026
NITA E 40W40h Glenbrook-Corey/Varcheva
2026 NITA1 ESL Adult 40 & Over · NITA ESL 40 & Over 4.0 Women · 40+
2026
NITA S 40W40g TAM-Lobo-Corey
2026 NITA3 Summer Adult 40 & Over · NITA Summer Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women · 40+
2026
NITA W 40W40f Glenbrook-Corey/Varcheva
2026 NITA2 Winter Adult 40 & Over · NITA Winter 40&Over 4.0 Women · 40+
2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
55.6%
99W–79L · 53.3% of games
4.5
40.5%
17W–25L · 47.6% of games
5.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
31.2%
5W–11L · 46.9% of games
8.5
39%
16W–25L · 44.2% of games
10.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 45.5% of games
8.0mixed
28.6%
6W–15L · 45.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
101 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
82 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
76 matches
#1 Singles
14%
42 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova