Alja Hessami-Maas
Chicago, IL
427 matches · 214W–213L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Alja Hessami-Maas to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history427 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-3, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-5, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-6, 1-0
W
N/A
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams92 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 18W3.5 1.Wilm Lund Sun 1 $25
CHI E 18W4.0 6.Tam Lund Sat 3 $25
CHI E 40W3.5 1.Tam Lund Sat 1 $25
CHI E 40W4.0 1.Tam Lund Sun 1 $25
CHI E 55W7.0 1.Tam Grabow Sun 1 $25
CHI E 55W8.0 2.STP Eisner Sun 10 $22
CDTA E 18&OW3.5 3Cent Lund Sun 1 $22
CDTA E 40&OW3.5 4Tam Lund Sat 1 $22
CDTA E 40&OW4.0 8Tam Lund Sun 1 $22
CDTA E 55&OW7.0 2Tam Grabow Sun 1
CDTA E 55&OW8.0 2Nielsen Ueda Sun 3 $22
CDTA E M18&O7.0 3Tam Leonardo Sat 7 $22
CDTA S 18&OW3.5 4.Wilm Lund Thu 7 $22
CDTA S 18&OW4.0 1.Tam Lund Tue 7 $22
CDTA S 40&OW3.5 5.Tam Lund Mon 7 $22
CDTA S 40&OW4.0 2.Tam Lund Thu 7 $22
CDTA S 55&OW7.0 4.Tam Grabow Mon 7 $22
CDTA S 55&OW8.0 3.STP Eisner Sun 10 $22
CDTA S TriWMid 3.Tam Landt Sun 1 $22
CDTA W 18&OW3.5 8.Wlmt Lund Sun 1 $22
CDTA W 40&OW3.5 5.Tam Lund Sat 1 $22
CDTA W 40&OW4.0 5.Tam Lund Sun 1 $22
CDTA W 55&OW7.0 6.Tam Grabow Sun 1 $22
CDTA W 55&OW8.0 4.STP Eisner Sun 10 $22
CDTA W ComboW7.5 4.Herit Eisner Sun 3 $25
NITA E 35W40e Wilmette-Lam
NITA E 40W40c River Trails-Lund/Lam
NITA S 35W40 Wilmette-Lam
NITA W 35W40f Wilmette-Lam
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
73.7%
112W–40L · 60.7% of games
4.0
32.1%
54W–114L · 43.9% of games
7.0
60%
9W–6L · 59.2% of games
7.5
36%
9W–16L · 43.1% of games
8.0
35.3%
12W–22L · 45.3% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 47.4% of games
8.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Singles, 28% of the time
#1 Singles
28%
120 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
113 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
98 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
85 matches
#2 Singles
2%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.