Teams

NITA S 35W40 Wilmette-Lam

2026 NITA3 Summer Adult 40 & Over · NITA Summer Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

23 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-17Won 30
W#1 DoublesAnne Gallagher / Naomi Fujimoto vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJudy Godinho / Tina Werber vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesPatty Lynch / Sharon Kerr-Zygmunt vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesLeigh Champagne / Sherry Polachek vs Sharon Hermanns / Emily Nash6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesTina Werber vs Rosa Abreu6-2, 5-0
L#2 DoublesNaomi Fujimoto / Patty Lynch vs Donna Myers / Nopp Kositt1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesChristine Esler / Katie Ketchum vs Lisa Bierman / Colleen Roberts6-4, 5-0
2026-07-12Won 40
W#1 DoublesKatie Ketchum / Cathi Cappas vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesTina Werber vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDenise Schneider / Lucie Kreidler vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLeigh Champagne / Sharon Kerr-Zygmunt vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesLisa Young / Leigh Champagne vs Kristine Oakey / Kersten Gorski6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChristine Kupfer / Mandy Shaw vs Christine Rusthoven / Diane Krecek6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesSharon Kerr-Zygmunt / Anne Gallagher vs KIM DOUGHERTY / Laurie Eichelman3-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesDimitrina Schoyer / Lisa Young vs Lina Kamenev / Katie Jones6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSherry Polachek / Jane Ford vs Toni Mountcastle / Caitlin Strung6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDenise Lam / Patty Lynch vs Lisa Ventrella / Genious Chaudhry5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 DoublesCathi Cappas / Lisa Young vs Sharon Hermanns / Donna Myers6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPatty Lynch / Lucie Kreidler vs Laura Nations / Colleen Roberts6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAlja Hessami-Maas / Christine Esler vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesJane Ford / Lisa Young vs Pam Byerly / Simona Fojtikova6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDenise Lam vs Joni Sherman6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMio Dahlquist / Christine Kupfer vs Patricia Kladis-Schiappa / Melissa Maderia6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDimitrina Schoyer / Laura Knapp vs Nancy Dugan / Jill Lovelace6-0, 6-2
W#1 DoublesJane Ford / Lisa Young vs Toni Mountcastle / Audra Kammerait6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesDenise Lam vs Laura Maslowski3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDimitrina Schoyer / Mio Dahlquist vs Caitlin Strung / Julie Roth4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChristine Kupfer / Mandy Shaw vs Tara Borre / Kristin Brown6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · NITA Summer Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA S 35W40 Wilmette-Lam702628141
2NITA S 35W40 Park Forest-Bai/Young62201229247
3NITA S 35W40 Naperville-Gabel53201229267
4NITA S 35W40 Wheaton-Benventi/Detrick53191332277
5NITA S 35W40 Courts Plus-Barsotti/Mountcastle53171533283
6NITA S 35W40 Oak Park Tennis-Meyers/Katz44131942293
7NITA S 35W40 Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko3491942267
8NITA S 35W40 Lifetime-Rusthoven/Stapleton26122042308
9NITA S 35W40 Score-Michl/Moskowitz1682044300
10NITA S 35W40 Five Star-Delgrosso0782045304

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Tina Werber
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.67
Leigh Champagne
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Denise Lam
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.52
Mio Dahlquist
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.51
Jane Ford
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.43
Alja Hessami-Maas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Mandy Shaw
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.39
Sherry Polachek
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.39
Dimitrina Schoyer
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Christine Kupfer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Katie Ketchum
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Lucie Kreidler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Naomi Fujimoto
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Judy Godinho
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Denise Schneider
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Anne Gallagher
published 3.5
3.24
Nancy Valerio
published 3.5
3.23
Christine Esler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Cathi Cappas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Sharon Kerr-Zygmunt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Rochelle Probst
published
Laura Knapp
published
Patty Lynch
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dimitrina Schoyer + Denise Lam21461% games+7.9% vs expected
Christine Kupfer + Mandy Shaw644053% games+1.0% vs expected
Naomi Fujimoto + Lucie Kreidler314 matchesnot enough data
Naomi Fujimoto + Dimitrina Schoyer134 matchesnot enough data
Alja Hessami-Maas + Sharon Kerr-Zygmunt134 matchesnot enough data
Alja Hessami-Maas + Mandy Shaw224 matchesnot enough data
Lucie Kreidler + Christine Esler224 matchesnot enough data
Judy Godinho + Sherry Polachek224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Tina Werber
131W–65L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.72
Leigh Champagne
65W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.67
3.5
Denise Lam
320W–95L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.61
3.5
Mio Dahlquist
107W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.52
Jane Ford
76W–39L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Alja Hessami-Maas
214W–213L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
Mandy Shaw
99W–76L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Sherry Polachek
138W–76L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.39
3.5
Dimitrina Schoyer
286W–188L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Christine Kupfer
111W–70L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Katie Ketchum
70W–66L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Lucie Kreidler
165W–131L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Naomi Fujimoto
65W–56L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Judy Godinho
79W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Denise Schneider
101W–70L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Anne Gallagher
35W–15L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Nancy Valerio
69W–65L career · no lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Christine Esler
143W–102L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Cathi Cappas
115W–93L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Sharon Kerr-Zygmunt
156W–115L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
3.15
Rochelle Probst
67W–49L career · no lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.12
Laura Knapp
44W–45L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Patty Lynch
28W–31L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.