← Search

Rochelle Probst

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chicago, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
139 matches · 84W–55L · seasons 2018–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2024 and 2023. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history139 matches
W
Default
2026-04-13 · NITA W 75CWe Wilmette-Wright/Nakamura · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Illana Hodges
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-06 · NITA W 75CWe Wilmette-Wright/Nakamura · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eileen Lee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-03-15 · CDTA W 18&OW3.5 5.MTC Brown-2 Sat 5 $33.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Carr
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-06 · NITA W 35W40f Wilmette-Lam · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Kupfer
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-02-15 · CDTA W 18&OW3.5 5.MTC Brown-2 Sat 5 $33.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Anderson
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-06 · NITA W 35W40f Wilmette-Lam · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan Kilian
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-5
W
Default
2025-12-14 · NITA E 35W40e Wilmette-Lam · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christy Kyhl
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-11-22 · NITA E 35W40e Wilmette-Lam · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Naomi Fujimoto
loading the estimate
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-16 · CDTA E 18&OW3.5 2MTC Brown2 Sat 5 $33.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Gallagher
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
Default
2025-11-15 · NITA E 35W40e Wilmette-Lam · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linlee Elbert
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-11-01 · CDTA E 18&OW3.5 2MTC Brown2 Sat 5 $33.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claire Mcbride
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-10-05 · CDTA E 18&OW3.5 2MTC Brown2 Sat 5 $33.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claire Mcbride
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
57.9%
11W–8L · 54.1% of games
3.5
52.4%
22W–20L · 51.3% of games
7.5
64.3%
27W–15L · 55.8% of games
7.0mixed
64.5%
20W–11L · 57.1% of games
7.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 62.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
55 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
44 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
33 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King