Christine Kupfer
Chicago, IL
181 matches · 111W–70L · seasons 2021–2026
Captains: add Christine Kupfer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history181 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-2, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
Shelley Young / Jessica Barnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 18W3.5 1.Wilm Lund Sun 1 $25
CHI E 40W3.5 1.Tam Lund Sat 1 $25
CHI E 55W7.0 1.Tam Grabow Sun 1 $25
NITA E 35W40d Park Forest-Bai/Young
CDTA E 18&OW3.5 3Cent Lund Sun 1 $22
CDTA E 40&OW3.5 4Tam Lund Sat 1 $22
CDTA E 55&OW7.0 2Tam Grabow Sun 1
CDTA E M18&O7.0 4FV Werts Sat 2 $25
CDTA S 18&OW3.5 4.Wilm Lund Thu 7 $22
CDTA S 40&OW3.5 5.Tam Lund Mon 7 $22
CDTA S 55&OW7.0 4.Tam Grabow Mon 7 $22
CDTA S ComboX7.5 1.MTC Brown Sat 7 $33.5
CDTA S M40&O7.0 5.Tam Lam Fri 7 $22
CDTA S TriWLo 8.Score Reece Sat 9 $20
CDTA W 18&OW3.5 8.Wlmt Lund Sun 1 $22
CDTA W 40&OW3.5 5.Tam Lund Sat 1 $22
CDTA W 55&OW7.0 6.Tam Grabow Sun 1 $22
CDTA W M18&O7.0 6.FV Werts Sat 2 $25
NITA E 35W40e Wilmette-Lam
NITA S 35W40 Wilmette-Lam
NITA S 75WCg Wilmette-Wright/Nakamura
NITA W 35W40f Wilmette-Lam
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
63.8%
81W–46L · 56.7% of games
7.0
72.7%
16W–6L · 58.1% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 42.7% of games
7.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 48.1% of games
8.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
67 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
50 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.