Teams

NITA S 75WCg Wilmette-Wright/Nakamura

2026 NITA3 Summerz Combo · 7.5 Summer Combo

23 players · average NTRP 3.71 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesClaudia Ma / Christine Kupfer vs Erica White / Lisa Obrien6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHuan Chang / Lydia Jeon vs Jackie Smith / Meg Griffin6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSophia Koliatsis / Christie Jordan vs Jennifer Peterson / Deirdre Sebastian6-3, 6-2
W#1 DoublesChristine Kupfer / Anne Ordway vs Alyssa Buetikofer / Deborah Marshall6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesEmily Lund / Patty Lynch vs Kristin Lamb / Toni Mountcastle7-6, 1-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesYumi Ida / Lydia Jeon vs Tracy Ries / Lisa Ventrella7-6, 4-1
2026-07-09vs NITA S 75WCa Five Star-DelgrossoWon 20
W#1 DoublesMargaret Weiss / SoYoung Grote vs Dorothy OMalley / Lindsay Freeman3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Valerio / Leah Larmond vs Lisa Stoneberg / Gail Kennedy7-6, 4-3
2026-06-19vs NITA S 75WCe Rush Copley-StineWon 21
W#1 DoublesAyano Nakamura / Claire Tramm vs Haley Mclain / Diana McClaurin6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJeanne Tromp / Nancy Valerio vs Khankeo Khounborin / Vanessa Baker4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEmily Lund / Patty Lynch vs Veronique Doebeli Saxe / Jessica Priebe6-4, 6-1
2026-06-01vs NITA S 75WCf Wheaton-LaBue/ReeseWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristie Jordan / Ayano Nakamura vs Shelley Reese / Mary Rybicki6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesClaudia Ma / Mio Dahlquist vs Marilyn Tansey / Meg Thompson7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAnne Ordway / Jeanne Tromp vs Michele Muchmore / Joan Labue6-0, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 DoublesClaire Tramm / Mary Therese Lee vs Julie Ladewig / Christina Griffith6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesYumi Ida / Mio Dahlquist vs Monika Nalepa / Jennifer Huffaker6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJeanne Tromp / Sophia Koliatsis vs Cari Anderson / Allycn Grcevic7-5, 5-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 7.5 Summer Combo
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA S 75WCg Wilmette-Wright/Nakamura6013513137
2NITA S 75WCb Homewood-Young/Anderson4212614108
3NITA S 75WCc River Trails-Grasse/White4211718142
4NITA S 75WCa Five Star-Delgrosso339918148
5NITA S 75WCf Wheaton-LaBue/Reese2481024174
6NITA S 75WCe Rush Copley-Stine1561226194
7NITA S 75WCd Naperville-Parse/Lamb1541429186

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Ayano Nakamura
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.31
Mary Therese Lee
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
4.11
Claudia Ma
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.96
Huan Chang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.93
Anne Ordway
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.78
Yumi Ida
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Illana Hodges
published 4
3.75
Sophia Koliatsis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Emily Lund
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.59
Margaret Weiss
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.52
Mio Dahlquist
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Tanja Boskovic
published 3.5
3.38
Christine Kupfer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Claire Tramm
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.29
Jeanne Tromp
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
SoYoung Grote
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Nancy Valerio
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Rochelle Probst
published
3.02
Christie Jordan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Leah Larmond
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lydia Jeon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Patty Lynch
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christie Jordan + Ayano Nakamura9077% games+20.9% vs expected
Jeanne Tromp + Ayano Nakamura5366% games+16.9% vs expected
Tanja Boskovic + Emily Lund7262% games+13.1% vs expected
Sophia Koliatsis + Ayano Nakamura7063% games+10.5% vs expected
Mary Therese Lee + Ayano Nakamura181453% games−0.5% vs expected
Yumi Ida + Ayano Nakamura4257% games−0.6% vs expected
Huan Chang + Mary Therese Lee3247% games−3.7% vs expected
Ayano Nakamura + Anne Ordway5355% games−6.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ayano Nakamura
331W–128L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
4.41
Mary Therese Lee
212W–126L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
4.31
4
Claudia Ma
41W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
4.11
4
Huan Chang
201W–143L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Anne Ordway
87W–81L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.93
4
Yumi Ida
185W–161L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Illana Hodges
164W–80L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Sophia Koliatsis
341W–195L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Emily Lund
256W–130L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.63
Margaret Weiss
83W–41L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.59
3.5
Mio Dahlquist
107W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Tanja Boskovic
194W–136L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Christine Kupfer
111W–70L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.38
3
Claire Tramm
29W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.32
3.5
Jeanne Tromp
144W–60L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
SoYoung Grote
111W–94L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Fra Angelica Farinas- Wright
70W–29L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Nancy Valerio
69W–65L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
Rochelle Probst
67W–49L career · no lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.12
3
Christie Jordan
84W–43L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
Leah Larmond
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Lydia Jeon
20W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Patty Lynch
28W–31L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.