Teams

NITA S 75WCa Five Star-Delgrosso

2026 NITA3 Summerz Combo · 7.5 Summer Combo

12 players · average NTRP 3.64 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesPatricia Nelson / Erika Baka vs Ally Bachmann / Susan DiMagno1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSuzi Feliciano / Colleen Doyle vs Kristen Long / Monika Nalepa4-6, 0-6
2026-07-29vs NITA S 75WCf Wheaton-LaBue/ReeseWon 10
W#3 DoublesErika Baka / Martha Skryd vs Debbi Landorf / Lori Mills6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLisa Stoneberg / Michelle Dougherty vs Karen Grasse / Loreal Leonard1-6, 5-6
L#3 DoublesTracey Rubach / Colleen Doyle vs Christine Juneman / Rose Milkowski3-6, 5-3, 0-1
L#1 DoublesDorothy OMalley / Lindsay Freeman vs Margaret Weiss / SoYoung Grote3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Stoneberg / Gail Kennedy vs Nancy Valerio / Leah Larmond6-7, 3-4
W#3 DoublesErika Baka / Laurie Manzardo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesJennifer Smith / Suzi Feliciano vs Angela Lukas / Toni Mountcastle6-4, 6-2
2026-05-15vs NITA S 75WCe Rush Copley-StineWon 20
W#2 DoublesDorothy OMalley / Michelle Dougherty vs Betsy Utterback / Jessica Priebe6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLesa Moskowitz / Laurie Manzardo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 7.5 Summer Combo
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA S 75WCg Wilmette-Wright/Nakamura6013513137
2NITA S 75WCb Homewood-Young/Anderson4212614108
3NITA S 75WCc River Trails-Grasse/White4211718142
4NITA S 75WCa Five Star-Delgrosso339918148
5NITA S 75WCf Wheaton-LaBue/Reese2481024174
6NITA S 75WCe Rush Copley-Stine1561226194
7NITA S 75WCd Naperville-Parse/Lamb1541429186

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Colleen Doyle
published 4
3.56
Dorothy OMalley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.47
Martha Skryd
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.29
Lesa Moskowitz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Erika Baka
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Suzi Feliciano
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.19
Michelle Dougherty
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Gail Kennedy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Tracey Rubach
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Laurie Delgrosso
published
Patricia Nelson
published
Robin Dickerson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laurie Delgrosso + Patricia Nelson18660% games+4.5% vs expected
Dorothy OMalley + Martha Skryd8851% games+3.8% vs expected
Dorothy OMalley + Lesa Moskowitz2446% games+3.4% vs expected
Dorothy OMalley + Gail Kennedy8258% games+2.9% vs expected
Michelle Dougherty + Suzi Feliciano91247% games−1.8% vs expected
Erika Baka + Patricia Nelson5461% games−5.2% vs expected
Dorothy OMalley + Michelle Dougherty4547% games−5.9% vs expected
Erika Baka + Dorothy OMalley5351% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Colleen Doyle
19W–11L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Dorothy OMalley
173W–204L career · 2 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.56
4
Martha Skryd
87W–123L career · 1 line in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.47
3.5
Lesa Moskowitz
134W–118L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Erika Baka
99W–71L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Suzi Feliciano
73W–93L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Michelle Dougherty
31W–60L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Gail Kennedy
50W–51L career · 1 line in 2026
15%85%1%
3.15
3
Tracey Rubach
81W–141L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Laurie Delgrosso
22W–19L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Patricia Nelson
106W–45L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Robin Dickerson
40W–37L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.