SoYoung Grote
Arlington Heights, IL
206 matches · 112W–94L · seasons 2019–2027
Captains: add SoYoung Grote to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history206 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-6, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
Cheryl Ingram / Julie Schwan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-5, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-5, 1-0
W
N/A
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
Dorothy OMalley / Lindsay Freeman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 18W3.5 8.ACN Bergman Sun 5 $24
CHI E 40W3.5 8.CPW Ellison Sat 4 $30
CHI E 40W4.0 9.RT Jasinski Sun 6 $29
CDTA E 18&OW3.5 8Nielsen Bergman Sun 5 $22
CDTA E 40&OW3.5 5RT Greenberg Sun 6 $27
CDTA E 40&OW4.0 11RT Jasinski Sun 6 $27
CDTA S 18&OW3.5 7.Nielsen Bergman Sun 3 $22
CDTA S 40&OW3.5 1.CPW Ellison Sat 4 $25
CDTA S 40&OW4.0 10.RT Jasinski Tue 7 $27
CDTA S TriWLo 6.RT Ellison Sun 6 $27
CDTA W 18&OW3.5 10.Nielsen Bergman Sun 5 $22
CDTA W 40&OW3.5 8.CPW Ellison Sat 4 $25
CDTA W 40&OW4.0 8.RT Jasinski Sun 6 $27
NITA S 35W18a Naperville-Bianchi
NITA S 75WCg Wilmette-Wright/Nakamura
NITA W 35W18c Naperville-Bianchi
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
60%
9W–6L · 56.5% of games
3.5
55.1%
76W–62L · 53.2% of games
4.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 52.4% of games
6.5
60%
3W–2L · 54.8% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
55.6%
10W–8L · 52.6% of games
7.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 49.5% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
87 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
69 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
46 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.