Rosemary Swierk
Winnetka, IL
100 matches · 70W–30L · seasons 2025–2026
Captains: add Rosemary Swierk to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history100 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Mary Beth LeMay / Vina Maniquis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-5, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
N/A
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2025–2027
CHI E 18W3.5 12.Wilm Crisham Sat 5 $25
CHI E 40W3.5 8.CPW Ellison Sat 4 $30
CHI E 55W7.0 7.Tam Corey Fri 7:30 $25
CDTA E 18&OW3.0 5Cent Cohen Sun 3 $20
CDTA E 18&OW3.5 4Cent Crisham Sat 5 $22
CDTA E 40&OW3.0 8Glvw Tromp Fri 7 $21
CDTA E 40&OW3.5 8CPW Okada Sat 4 $28
CDTA E 55&OW7.0 7Tam Corey Fri 7:30 $22
CDTA S 18&OW3.5 14.Wilm Crisham Tue 7 $22
CDTA S 40&OW3.5 1.CPW Ellison Sat 4 $25
CDTA S 55&OW7.0 5.Tam Corey Fri 7 $22
CDTA S 55&OW8.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 1 $22
CDTA S ComboW6.5 2.Wilm Tromp Sat 9 $20
CDTA S ComboW7.5 2.Tam Corey Fri 7 $22
CDTA S M18&O8.0 3.Nielsen Phelps Sun 4 $22
CDTA S TriWMid 5.Nielsen Lund Sun 1 $22
CDTA W 18&OW3.5 1.Wlmt Crisham Sat 5 $22
CDTA W 40&OW3.5 8.CPW Ellison Sat 4 $25
CDTA W 55&OW7.0 5.Tam Corey Fri 7:30 $22
CDTA W 55&OW8.0 3.Tam Corey Sun 1 $22
CDTA W ComboW6.5 2.Gnvw Tromp Sat 5 $21
CDTA W ComboW7.5 2.Tam Corey Fri 7:30 $22
CDTA W TriWMid 4.Nielsen Lund Sun 3 $22
CHI F CW6.5 5.Gnvw Tromp Sat 5 $21
CHI F CW7.5 3.ACN Lund Sun 3 $24
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
89.5%
17W–2L · 65.7% of games
3.5
60.5%
23W–15L · 57.4% of games
6.5
83.3%
10W–2L · 66.8% of games
7.0
71.4%
10W–4L · 60.5% of games
7.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 57.7% of games
8.0
50%
2W–2L · 50% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
45 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
21 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.