← Search

Vina Maniquis

Chicago, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
197 matches · 98W–99L · seasons 2021–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.25
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 21 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Chicago · 3.5
55 of 64
IL · 3.5
256 of 327
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Vina is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Vina has been a steady 3.5 across all 6 seasons on record.

3.03.5202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Vina has gone from the 58th to the 62nd percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.5
62.1%
59W–36L · 55.1% of games
4.0
33.3%
5W–10L · 45.5% of games
4.5
25%
2W–6L · 40.7% of games
7.0
66.7%
22W–11L · 55.2% of games
7.5
21.1%
4W–15L · 35.4% of games
8.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 37.6% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history197 matches
W
Heather Welch / Kimberly Pfahl
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Alexander
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-4
W
Kristen Geil / Julianne Hartzell
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Kerr-Zygmunt
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Naomi Fujimoto
−0.028below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carey Goldblatt
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-1
L
Lanna Melik / Cathi Cappas
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alja Hessami-Maas
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-29 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Apple Naughton
+0.003about as expected — took 50% of games against 50% expected
6-7, 4-3
W
Nicole Toft / Susan Barton
2026-03-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mandy Shaw
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-03-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alja Hessami-Maas
+0.017better than expected — took 59% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W
Donna Salvatore / Sarah W Johnson
2026-03-14 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Egan
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-0, 6-7
W
Nancy Nora / Kim Vandegrift
2026-03-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Naomi Fujimoto
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 5-3
W
2026-03-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Kupfer
+0.005about as expected — took 52% of games against 51% expected
7-6, 3-4, 1-0
W
Claudine Seidel / Sarah Haas
2026-02-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alja Hessami-Maas
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 2-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.