Janet Mital
Park Ridge, IL
122 matches · 41W–81L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Janet Mital to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history122 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
Courtney Robson / Brenda Robles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-5
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 18W3.0 9.Gnvw Brown Sat 5 $24
CHI E 18W3.5 16.Tam Freund Sun 3 $25
CHI E 40W3.0 6.Wilm Goldberg Sun 7 $20
CHI E 40W3.5 2.Tam Kanev Sun 3 $25
CHI E 55W7.0 8.Her Lamey Sat 2 $26
CDTA E 18&OW3.0 7Cent Tromp Sun 7 $20
CDTA E 40&OW3.0 2RT Cox Sun 4 $27
CDTA E 40&OW3.5 2Tam Kanev Sun 3 $22
CDTA E 55&OW7.0 5Herit Hanrahan Sat 2 $25
CDTA S 18&OW3.0 5.Wilm Brown Mon 7 $20
CDTA S 18&OW3.5 5.Tam Freund Wed 7 $22
CDTA S 40&OW3.5 6.Tam Kanev Sun 3 $22
CDTA S ComboW6.5 2.Wilm Tromp Sat 9 $20
CDTA S TriWLo 6.RT Ellison Sun 6 $27
CDTA W 18&OW3.0 5.Wlmt Tromp Sun 7 $20
CDTA W 18&OW3.5 16.Tam Freund Sat 3 $22
CDTA W 40&OW3.0 4.RT Cox Sun 4 $27
CDTA W 40&OW3.5 6.Tam Kanev Sun 3 $22
CDTA W 55&OW7.0 3.Herit Hanrahan Sat 2 $25
CDTA W ComboW6.5 2.Gnvw Tromp Sat 5 $21
CHI F CW6.5 5.Gnvw Tromp Sat 5 $21
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
35.7%
10W–18L · 45% of games
3.5
29.6%
21W–50L · 40.8% of games
6.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 48.4% of games
7.0
50%
6W–6L · 47.8% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 68% of the time
#3 Doubles
68%
83 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
6%
7 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.