← Search

Sharon Kerr-Zygmunt

Lombard, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
271 matches · 156W–115L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sharon Kerr-Zygmunt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history271 matches
W
2026-08-23 · CDTA S 55&OW7.0 4.Tam Grabow Mon 7 $22 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Megan Crisham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-0
L
2026-08-05 · CDTA S 55&OW7.0 4.Tam Grabow Mon 7 $22 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christine Kupfer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-28 · CDTA S 55&OW7.0 4.Tam Grabow Mon 7 $22 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alja Hessami-Maas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · CDTA S 18&OW3.5 4.Wilm Lund Thu 7 $22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vina Maniquis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
N/A
2026-07-17 · NITA S 35W40 Wilmette-Lam · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patty Lynch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-16 · CDTA S 40&OW3.5 5.Tam Lund Mon 7 $22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Crisham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-5
L
2026-07-12 · CDTA S 55&OW7.0 4.Tam Grabow Mon 7 $22 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alja Hessami-Maas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-5, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-07-12 · NITA S 35W40 Wilmette-Lam · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leigh Champagne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-09 · NITA S 35W40 Wilmette-Lam · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Gallagher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
Chris Nelson / Kimberly Pfahl
2026-07-06 · CDTA S 55&OW7.0 4.Tam Grabow Mon 7 $22 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Antje Boeing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-3
W
2026-06-13 · NITA S 70W55b Courts Plus-Barsotti/Roth · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dawn Beneventi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-07 · CDTA S 18&OW3.5 4.Wilm Lund Thu 7 $22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mara Berkun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams69 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 18W3.5 1.Wilm Lund Sun 1 $25
ESL 18 & Over · Women 3.5 · 18+
2027
CHI E 40W3.5 1.Tam Lund Sat 1 $25
ESL 40 & Over · Women 3.5 · 40+
2027
CHI E 55W7.0 1.Tam Grabow Sun 1 $25
ESL 55 & Over · Women 7.0 · 55+
2027
NITA E 70W55b Courts Plus-Barsotti/Roth
2027 NITA1 ESL Adult 55 & Over · NITA ESL 55 & Over 7.0 Women · 55+
2027
CDTA E 18&OW3.5 3Cent Lund Sun 1 $22
CDTA ESL 18 & Over · CDTA E 18&O Women 3.5 · 18+
2026
CDTA E 40&OW3.5 4Tam Lund Sat 1 $22
CDTA ESL 40 & Over · CDTA E 40&O Women 3.5 · 40+
2026
CDTA E 55&OW7.0 2Tam Grabow Sun 1
CDTA ESL 55 & Over · CDTA E 55&O Women 7.0 · 55+
2026
CDTA S 18&OW3.5 4.Wilm Lund Thu 7 $22
1Summer 18&O WN/WE · Women 3.5 · 18+
2026
CDTA S 40&OW3.5 5.Tam Lund Mon 7 $22
1Summer 40&O WN/WE · Women 3.5 · 40+
2026
CDTA S 55&OW7.0 4.Tam Grabow Mon 7 $22
1Summer 55&O WN/WE · Women 7.0 · 55+
2026
CDTA W 18&OW3.5 8.Wlmt Lund Sun 1 $22
CDTA 1Winter 18 & Over W/E · CDTA 18 & Over W 3.5 Winter · 18+
2026
CDTA W 40&OW3.5 5.Tam Lund Sat 1 $22
CDTA 1Winter 40 & Over W/E · CDTA 40 & Over W 3.5 Winter · 40+
2026
CDTA W 55&OW7.0 6.Tam Grabow Sun 1 $22
CDTA 1Winter 55 & over W/E · CDTA 55 & Over W 7.0 Winter · 55+
2026
NITA S 35W40 Wilmette-Lam
2026 NITA3 Summer Adult 40 & Over · NITA Summer Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women · 40+
2026
NITA S 70W55b Courts Plus-Barsotti/Roth
2026 NITA3 Summer Adult 55 & Over · NITA Summer Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women · 55+
2026
NITA S 75WCDb Health Track-Brown/Anders
2026 NITA3 Summerz Combo Daytime · NITA Summer Daytime 7.5 Combo Women
2026
NITA W 35W40f Wilmette-Lam
2026 NITA2 Winter Adult 40 & Over · NITA Winter 40&Over 3.5 Women · 40+
2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
60%
60W–40L · 56.4% of games
4.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 58.4% of games
6.5
55.6%
10W–8L · 55.8% of games
7.0
65.3%
47W–25L · 59.6% of games
7.5
45.2%
14W–17L · 48.4% of games
8.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 61.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
121 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
90 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
59 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe