Lucie Kreidler
Mount Prospect, IL
296 matches · 165W–131L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Lucie Kreidler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history296 matches
L
Julia Visser / Teresa Konyndyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-4, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-4
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-4
W
N/A
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-4
W
N/A
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams76 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 18W3.5 1.Wilm Lund Sun 1 $25
CHI E 40W3.5 1.Tam Lund Sat 1 $25
CHI E 40W4.0 9.RT Jasinski Sun 6 $29
CHI E 55W7.0 1.Tam Grabow Sun 1 $25
CHI E M40.7.0 6.RT Schoyer Sat 2 $29
CDTA E 18&OW3.5 11Tam Battin Sat 1 $22
CDTA E 40&OW3.5 5RT Greenberg Sun 6 $27
CDTA E 40&OW4.0 11RT Jasinski Sun 6 $27
CDTA E 55&OW7.0 2Tam Grabow Sun 1
CDTA E M40&O7.0 1RT Schoyer Sat 7 $27
CDTA S 40&OW3.5 6.Tam Kanev Sun 3 $22
CDTA S 40&OW4.0 10.RT Jasinski Tue 7 $27
CDTA S 55&OW7.0 4.Tam Grabow Mon 7 $22
CDTA S M40&O7.0 2.RT Schoyer Sat 5 $27
CDTA S TriWLo 6.RT Ellison Sun 6 $27
CDTA W 18&OW3.5 16.Tam Freund Sat 3 $22
CDTA W 40&OW3.5 6.Tam Kanev Sun 3 $22
CDTA W 40&OW4.0 8.RT Jasinski Sun 6 $27
CDTA W 55&OW7.0 6.Tam Grabow Sun 1 $22
CDTA W ComboW7.5 4.Herit Eisner Sun 3 $25
CDTA W M40&O7.0 3.RT Schoyer Sat 2 $27
NITA E 70MX40b River Trails-Miller
NITA S 35W18b River Trails-Lam
NITA S 35W40 Wilmette-Lam
NITA W 35W18d River Trails-Lam
NITA W 35W40f Wilmette-Lam
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
52.9%
27W–24L · 51.6% of games
3.5
57.1%
76W–57L · 53% of games
4.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 56.7% of games
6.5
60%
3W–2L · 58.3% of games
7.0
54.5%
12W–10L · 54.5% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 42.9% of games
7.0mixed
63.4%
26W–15L · 54.7% of games
7.5mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 50.5% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
116 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
96 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
80 matches
#1 Singles
1%
4 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.