Apple Naughton
Park Ridge, IL
420 matches · 226W–194L · seasons 2019–2027
Captains: add Apple Naughton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history420 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
Katie Sullivan / Karen Oppenheim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-4, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-3, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-3
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams104 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 18W4.0 8.ACN Lund Sun 4 $24
CHI E 40W3.5 1.Tam Lund Sat 1 $25
CHI E 40W4.0 3.ACN Burnside Sat 4 $24
CDTA E 18&OW4.0 9Nielsen Lund Sun 4 $22
CDTA E 40&OW3.5 5RT Greenberg Sun 6 $27
CDTA E 40&OW4.0 7Nielsen Burnside Sat 4 $22
CDTA E 55&OW7.0 4RCLB Eichner Sun 4 $22
CDTA E M40&O7.0 1RT Schoyer Sat 7 $27
CDTA S 18&OW3.5 4.Wilm Lund Thu 7 $22
CDTA S 18&OW4.0 7.Nielsen Lund Sun 5 $22
CDTA S 40&OW4.0 1.Nielsen Burnside Sat 4 $22
CDTA S 55&OW7.0 7.RCLB Eichner Tue 7 $22
CDTA S M40&O7.0 2.RT Schoyer Sat 5 $27
CDTA S TriWLo 5.RT Ford Sat 2 $27
CDTA S TriWMid 5.Nielsen Lund Sun 1 $22
CDTA W 18&OW4.0 12.RT Chionis Sun 4 $27
CDTA W 55&OW7.0 9.RCLB Eichner Sun 6 $22
CDTA W 55&OW8.0 8.STP ODonnell Sun 10 $22
CDTA W ComboX7.5 2.RT Spinazze Sat 7 $2
CDTA W M40&O7.0 3.RT Schoyer Sat 2 $27
CDTA W TriWLo 1.RT Ford Sat 2 $27
CDTA W TriWMid 4.Nielsen Lund Sun 3 $22
CHI F CW7.5 3.ACN Lund Sun 3 $24
NITA E 35W40e Wilmette-Lam
NITA E 40W18b River Trails-Spinazze/Lam
NITA E 70MX40c NMHFC-Lawver/Venckus
NITA W 70MX18a Racket Club-Lawver
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 58.1% of games
3.5
52.1%
88W–81L · 52.2% of games
4.0
47.8%
11W–12L · 52.9% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
71.4%
15W–6L · 58.9% of games
7.5
40%
14W–21L · 49.9% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.1% of games
7.0mixed
67.9%
53W–25L · 57.3% of games
7.5mixed
60%
18W–12L · 58.7% of games
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 41.9% of games
8.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
162 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
131 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
123 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.