Mariusz Cislak
Park Ridge, IL
412 matches · 255W–157L · seasons 2020–2027
Captains: add Mariusz Cislak to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history412 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
N/A
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
N/A
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Michael Ballinger / Robert Vanhootegem
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams88 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 40M4.0 3.RT Lawver Sat 5 $29
CHI E 55M7.0 7.RT Peroussanov Sun 4 $29
NITA E 35M40c Huntley-Lawver/Cislak
NITA E 70MX18d Racket Club-Lawver
NITA E 70MX40b Racket Club-Lawver
CDTA E 40&OM3.5 3RT Ciuca Sun 2 $27
CDTA E 40&OM4.0 3RT Peroussanov Sat 5 $27
CDTA E M40&O7.0 1RT Schoyer Sat 7 $27
CDTA S 40&OM3.5 2.RT Ciuca Wed 7 $27
CDTA S 40&OM4.0 4.RT Cislak Sat 5 $27
CDTA S M40&O7.0 2.RT Schoyer Sat 5 $27
CDTA W 40&OM3.5 1.RT Ciuca Sun 2 $27
CDTA W 40&OM4.0 3.RT Peroussanov Sat 5 $27
CDTA W 55&OM7.0 2.RT Peroussanov Sat 8 $27
CDTA W ComboX7.5 2.RT Spinazze Sat 7 $2
CDTA W M18&O8.0 8.RT Burks Sun 6 $27
CDTA W M40&O7.0 3.RT Schoyer Sat 2 $27
NITA E 35M18b Racket Club-Lawver
NITA E 35M40c Racket Club-Lawver
NITA E 70MX40c NMHFC-Lawver/Venckus
NITA E 80MX40d NMHFCH-Lawver
NITA S 35M40b Huntley-Lawver/Cislak
NITA S 65CMXe Huntley-Lawver
NITA S 70MX18d Racket Club-Lawver/Cislak
NITA S 75CMXc Racket Club-Lawver/Cislak
NITA S 80MX18c Huntley-Lawver/Cislak
NITA S 85CMc Huntley-Lawver
NITA W 35M40b NMHFCH-Lawver
NITA W 70MX18a Racket Club-Lawver
NITA W 75CMXb NMHFCH-Lawver
NITA W 80MX40b NMHFCH-Lawver
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
65.9%
87W–45L · 56.3% of games
4.0
26.1%
6W–17L · 47.4% of games
7.0
40%
2W–3L · 46.7% of games
7.5
60%
3W–2L · 68.4% of games
6.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 52.4% of games
7.0mixed
71.7%
99W–39L · 58.2% of games
7.5mixed
61%
25W–16L · 56.2% of games
8.0mixed
47.4%
9W–10L · 53% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
151 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
132 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
124 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
4 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.