Teams

NITA E 40W18b River Trails-Spinazze/Lam

2026 NITA1 ESL Adult 18 & Over · NITA ESL 18 & Over 4.0 Women

27 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
L#1 DoublesErica White / Melissa Robinson vs Jenny Jaynes / Betsy Utterback1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMary Kate Montgomery vs Karyn Michalik6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJane Ford / Denise Lam vs Rebecca Stine / Heidi Brand6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLinh Bailey / Chris Purcell vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-12-06vs NITA E 40W18e Score-Knutte/OdenbeckSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSusan Klumpner / Kim Kuwabara vs Leeza Bodnar / Kristy Sweigard6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAngela Tsang vs Monika Nalepa6-2, 3-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJeanine Stathopoulos / Liza Spinazze vs Cindy Bielik / Nancy Cushing6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLydia Doyle / Urszula Farry vs Laurie Knutte / Jill Odenbeck2-6, 1-6
2025-11-22vs NITA E 40W18e Score-Knutte/OdenbeckSplit 22
L#1 DoublesAlicia Ballesteros / Sara Olson vs Jill Odenbeck / Laurie Knutte4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesEllen Angeletti vs Cindy Bielik2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Klumpner / Jeanine Stathopoulos vs Erin van Kampen / Ann Murtaugh6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAngela Tsang / Lydia Doyle vs Kristy Sweigard / Marinne Leonard6-2, 7-6
2025-11-16vs NITA E 40W18g Naperville-MaduraWon 40
W#1 DoublesMichelle Parks / Lydia Doyle vs Martha Skryd / Teri Andersen6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesKelly Couris vs Tiffany Oken6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCheryl Jasinski / Amy Hattery vs Lindsay Freeman / Helen Yang7-5, 2-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnnalisa Tsai / Dimitrina Schoyer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-11-09vs NITA E 40W18c Oak Brook-LukasWon 31
W#1 DoublesChris Purcell / Mary Kate Montgomery vs Shannon Ebner / Marla Gerard5-7, 5-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesEllen Angeletti vs Lisa Vlach5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Parks / Urszula Farry vs Kara Levin / Julie Boruff7-5, 5-3
W#3 DoublesKim Kuwabara / Erica White vs Katerina Hickey / Louise Burnison6-3, 6-3
2025-11-02vs NITA E 40W18a TAM-Jurczyk/WrightWon 31
L#1 DoublesSara Olson / Liza Spinazze vs Kristine Jurczyk / Jessica Wagner5-7, 0-6
W#1 SinglesSofia Velasco vs Desiree Witte7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSophie Dimoff / Susan Klumpner vs Melissa Schopin / Dawn Baumann6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAngela Tsang / Alicia Ballesteros vs Haina Shin / Silvia Kusaka6-2, 6-2
2025-11-02vs NITA E 40W18f Norris-Sullivan/SkujaSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSophie Dimoff / Liza Spinazze vs Ellen Elliot / Laura Skuja7-5, 5-2
L#1 SinglesKelly Couris vs MEREDITH BETTCHER6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKim Kuwabara / Denise Lam vs Melissa Held / Renee Buxton7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAlicia Ballesteros / Jeanine Stathopoulos vs Denise Call / Jennifer Shields2-6, 0-6
2025-10-25vs NITA E 40W18f Norris-Sullivan/SkujaSplit 22
W#1 DoublesNarissa Breger / Lydia Doyle vs Cindy Sullivan / Meighan Pongonis1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesApple Naughton vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAnnalisa Tsai / Liza Spinazze vs Palida Jameson / Susie Wendel1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAlicia Ballesteros / Jeanine Stathopoulos vs Denise Call / Debbie Schaefer3-6, 2-6
2025-10-19vs NITA E 40W18a TAM-Jurczyk/WrightLost 12
W#1 SinglesSofia Velasco vs Svetlana Petrova6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJeanine Stathopoulos / Angela Tsang vs Jean Soh / Katherine Martin3-6, 5-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLydia Doyle / Sara Olson vs Christine Munteanu / Sophia Chang Stauffer1-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesChris Purcell / Urszula Farry vs Jenny Jaynes / Khankeo Khounborin6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKelly Couris vs Lisa Capp6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesErica White / Melissa Robinson vs Sandy Peters / Milada Vedrova6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLinh Bailey / Apple Naughton vs Rebecca Stine / Cheryl Engle7-6, 5-2
2025-10-04vs NITA E 40W18c Oak Brook-LukasWon 31
W#1 DoublesAlicia Ballesteros / Susan Klumpner vs Ann Ko / Sally Washlow6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJeanine Stathopoulos vs Katey Woltman6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLinh Bailey / Dimitrina Schoyer vs Julie Boruff / Angela Lukas5-7, 3-5
W#3 DoublesJane Ford / Amy Hattery vs Mary Ellen Young / Zagorka James6-3, 6-1
2025-09-12vs NITA E 40W18g Naperville-MaduraWon 40
W#1 DoublesSara Olson / Kim Kuwabara vs Laura Maslowski / Tracy Gallo6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesNarissa Breger vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle Parks / Cheryl Jasinski vs Martha Skryd / Sue Keough6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesErica White / Melissa Robinson vs Jeanne Johnson / Helen Yang6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · NITA ESL 18 & Over 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA E 40W18a TAM-Jurczyk/Wright102371129305
2NITA E 40W18e Score-Knutte/Odenbeck102361231346
3NITA E 40W18b River Trails-Spinazze/Lam84331534342
4NITA E 40W18f Norris-Sullivan/Skuja75262247358
5NITA E 40W18c Oak Brook-Lukas57262246405
6NITA E 40W18d Rush Copley-Stine/Downey11164285527
7NITA E 40W18g Naperville-Madura11144489551

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 25 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Kim Kuwabara
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
4.16
Sofia Velasco
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.14
Jeanine Stathopoulos
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
4.06
Sophie Dimoff
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.02
Alicia Ballesteros
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.94
Angela Tsang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.91
Kelly Couris
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.86
Susan Klumpner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.79
Liza Spinazze
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.78
Urszula Farry
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Lydia Doyle
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.75
Sara Olson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.74
Mary Kate Montgomery
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.73
Chris Purcell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Ellen Angeletti
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.64
Amy Hattery
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.59
Denise Lam
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.56
Linh Bailey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.55
Narissa Breger
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.54
Cheryl Jasinski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Annalisa Tsai
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.49
Melissa Robinson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.42
Apple Naughton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.41
Jane Ford
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Dimitrina Schoyer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Erica White
published
Michelle Parks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Purcell + Cheryl Jasinski9460% games+10.1% vs expected
Jeanine Stathopoulos + Liza Spinazze331556% games+9.5% vs expected
Linh Bailey + Apple Naughton9655% games+8.9% vs expected
Dimitrina Schoyer + Denise Lam21461% games+7.6% vs expected
Susan Klumpner + Jeanine Stathopoulos8161% games+7.1% vs expected
Melissa Robinson + Kim Kuwabara12264% games+3.3% vs expected
Apple Naughton + Urszula Farry8652% games+0.8% vs expected
Dimitrina Schoyer + Apple Naughton111249% games−1.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kim Kuwabara
174W–33L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
4.16
Sofia Velasco
23W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
4.16
4
Jeanine Stathopoulos
163W–71L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%16%84%
4.14
Sophie Dimoff
71W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
4.06
4
Alicia Ballesteros
59W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
4.02
4
Angela Tsang
41W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Kelly Couris
90W–49L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%73%26%
3.91
Susan Klumpner
117W–94L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.86
Liza Spinazze
149W–96L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.79
4
Urszula Farry
85W–43L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Lydia Doyle
41W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.77
Sara Olson
131W–57L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.75
Mary Kate Montgomery
31W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Chris Purcell
52W–47L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Ellen Angeletti
23W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Amy Hattery
44W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.64
3.5
Denise Lam
315W–90L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.59
4
Linh Bailey
56W–52L career · 3 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.56
4
Narissa Breger
155W–94L career · 2 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Cheryl Jasinski
43W–85L career · 2 lines in 2026
38%61%<1%
3.54
4
Annalisa Tsai
122W–81L career · 2 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.50
Melissa Robinson
91W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.49
3.5
Apple Naughton
225W–194L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
3.42
Jane Ford
76W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.41
3.5
Dimitrina Schoyer
286W–188L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Erica White
63W–26L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michelle Parks
45W–26L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.