Teams

NITA E 40W18g Naperville-Madura

2026 NITA1 ESL Adult 18 & Over · NITA ESL 18 & Over 4.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.64 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2025-12-14vs NITA E 40W18c Oak Brook-LukasLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaura Maslowski / Teri Andersen vs Jackie Smith / Wendy Leto1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLindsay Freeman / Martha Skryd vs Katerina Hickey / Louise Burnison1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJeanne Johnson / Noelle Tepas vs Marla Gerard / Mary Ellen Young2-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesMartha Skryd / Sue Keough vs Sandy Peters / Milada Vedrova6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesTracy Gallo vs Claire Meyer3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJeanne Johnson / Noelle Tepas vs Jenny Jaynes / Khankeo Khounborin1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesTeri Andersen / Rina Daw vs Rebecca Stine / Cheryl Engle3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-12-06vs NITA E 40W18a TAM-Jurczyk/WrightLost 02
L#1 DoublesAllison Genovese / Carole Liang vs Ana Chang / Martha Davis1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNoelle Tepas / Jeanne Johnson vs Hilary Fife / Emily Paris0-6, 0-6
2025-11-23vs NITA E 40W18a TAM-Jurczyk/WrightLost 04
L#1 DoublesJeanne Johnson / Noelle Tepas vs Anna Dau / Jean Soh0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesTiffany Oken vs Katherine Martin0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Maslowski / Helen Yang vs Christine Munteanu / Illana Hodges3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSue Keough / Lindsay Freeman vs Emily Cole / Leah Starkman2-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesMartha Skryd / Teri Andersen vs Michelle Parks / Lydia Doyle1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesTiffany Oken vs Kelly Couris2-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesTiffany Oken / Carole Liang vs Beverly Paperiello / Palida Jameson1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLaura Maslowski vs MEREDITH BETTCHER2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRina Daw / Sue Keough vs Angie Ulie / Laura Skuja2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTeri Andersen / Allison Genovese vs Melissa Held / Cindy Sullivan6-7, 5-7
L#1 DoublesNoelle Tepas / Carole Liang vs Angie Ulie / MEREDITH BETTCHER2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAllison Genovese vs Ellen Elliot2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHelen Yang / Teri Andersen vs Palida Jameson / Cindy Sullivan0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLindsay Freeman / Gail Kennedy vs Melissa Held / Debbie Schaefer5-7, 2-6
L#1 DoublesMartha Skryd / Rina Daw vs Nancy Cushing / Andrea Galligan Kuc2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesLaura Maslowski vs Marie Reece0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNoelle Tepas / Allison Genovese vs Erin van Kampen / Margaret Weiss3-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesHelen Yang / Tiffany Oken vs Karyn Michalik / Sandy Peters6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAllison Genovese vs Lida Downey6-2, 5-2
L#2 DoublesNoelle Tepas / Tracy Gallo vs Michele Kleeman / Betsy Utterback4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGail Kennedy / Teri Andersen vs Jenny Jaynes / Khankeo Khounborin1-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesNoelle Tepas / Tracy Gallo vs Cindy Bielik / Laurie Knutte6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesTiffany Oken vs Erin van Kampen2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMartha Skryd / Laura Maslowski vs Kristy Sweigard / Ngozi Ezike3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTeri Andersen / Jeanne Johnson vs Marinne Leonard / Ann Murtaugh2-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesLaura Maslowski / Tracy Gallo vs Sara Olson / Kim Kuwabara3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMartha Skryd / Sue Keough vs Michelle Parks / Cheryl Jasinski3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · NITA ESL 18 & Over 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA E 40W18a TAM-Jurczyk/Wright102371129305
2NITA E 40W18e Score-Knutte/Odenbeck102361231346
3NITA E 40W18b River Trails-Spinazze/Lam84331534342
4NITA E 40W18f Norris-Sullivan/Skuja75262247358
5NITA E 40W18c Oak Brook-Lukas57262246405
6NITA E 40W18d Rush Copley-Stine/Downey11164285527
7NITA E 40W18g Naperville-Madura11144489551

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Tiffany Oken
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.61
Laura Maslowski
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Tracy Gallo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.53
Rina Daw
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.50
Martha Skryd
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.50
Carole Liang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.47
Noelle Tepas
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.45
Allison Genovese
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.32
Sue Keough
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Helen Yang
published 3.5
3.24
Teri Andersen
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.16
Gail Kennedy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jeanne Johnson
published
Kris Madura
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Martha Skryd + Sue Keough4746% games−1.1% vs expected
Teri Andersen + Martha Skryd2833% games−3.4% vs expected
Teri Andersen + Allison Genovese2640% games−6.0% vs expected
Jeanne Johnson + Noelle Tepas31144% games−8.1% vs expected
Teri Andersen + Sue Keough3640% games−10.8% vs expected
Rina Daw + Teri Andersen224 matchesnot enough data
Rina Daw + Martha Skryd134 matchesnot enough data
Rina Daw + Sue Keough224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tiffany Oken
64W–45L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.74
Laura Maslowski
60W–55L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.61
Tracy Gallo
15W–34L career · 4 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.61
Rina Daw
34W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Martha Skryd
87W–123L career · 6 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.50
4
Carole Liang
34W–73L career · 3 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.50
Noelle Tepas
12W–53L career · 8 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
Allison Genovese
95W–90L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Sue Keough
57W–110L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Helen Yang
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Teri Andersen
35W–84L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Gail Kennedy
50W–53L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.16
Jeanne Johnson
7W–17L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kris Madura
4W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.