← Search

Tracy Gallo

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Naperville, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
51 matches · 17W–34L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history51 matches
W
2026-04-18 · NITA W 40W18b Naperville-Freeman/Johnson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Genovese
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-5
L
2026-03-29 · NITA W 40W18b Naperville-Freeman/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carole Liang
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-28 · NITA W 40W18b Naperville-Freeman/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsay Freeman
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-5
L
2026-03-14 · NITA W 40W18b Naperville-Freeman/Johnson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsay Freeman
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-10 · NITA W 40W18b Naperville-Freeman/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sue Keough
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-12-13 · NITA E 40W18g Naperville-Madura · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-09 · NITA E 70W55c Naperville-Sheridan/Ruden · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Claudia DeStefano
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
W
Default
2025-11-08 · NITA E 70W55c Naperville-Sheridan/Ruden · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carolyn Burger
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
Default
2025-11-01 · NITA E 70W55c Naperville-Sheridan/Ruden · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Claudia DeStefano
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-09-28 · NITA E 40W18g Naperville-Madura · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Noelle Tepas
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-27 · NITA E 40W18g Naperville-Madura · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Noelle Tepas
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
L
2025-09-12 · NITA E 40W18g Naperville-Madura · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Maslowski
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
27%
10W–27L · 41.5% of games
7.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 65.2% of games
7.5
20%
1W–4L · 37.8% of games
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
25 matches
#1 Singles
24%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova