← Search

Cindy Sullivan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Winfield, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
321 matches · 183W–138L · seasons 2018–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2023. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history321 matches
L
2026-10-18 · NITA E 40W40b Naperville-Pongonis/Sullivan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kris Caniglia
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-10-04 · NITA E 40W40b Naperville-Pongonis/Sullivan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Palida Jameson
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-03 · NITA E 40W18b Score-Odenbeck · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Odenbeck
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-20 · NITA E 40W40b Naperville-Pongonis/Sullivan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vicki Mitchell
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-09-20 · NITA F 85CWd Vaughan-McClure/McTeague · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lisa Kuchar
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-19 · NITA E 40W18b Score-Odenbeck · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristy Sweigard
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-09-12 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patricia Nelson championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-03 · CDTA S 55&OW8.0 7.STP Pirron Mon 7 $22 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patricia Nelson
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-30 · NITA S 85CWb Vaughan-McClure/McTeague · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jean Maren
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-16 · NITA S 85CWb Vaughan-McClure/McTeague · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elizabeth Huffman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-15 · NITA S 40W18a Score-Knutte/Odenbeck · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ngozi Ezike
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-3
L
2026-07-06 · NITA S 85CWb Vaughan-McClure/McTeague · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nancy Cushing
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams92 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
66.4%
101W–51L · 55.2% of games
4.5
0%
0W–4L · 38.8% of games
8.0
72.9%
35W–13L · 61% of games
8.5
43.3%
29W–38L · 46.7% of games
9.0
0%
0W–4L · 40.5% of games
8.0mixed
40%
12W–18L · 47.8% of games
8.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
159 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
101 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
61 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer