Shannon Ebner
Elmhurst, IL
143 matches · 84W–59L · seasons 2019–2027
Captains: add Shannon Ebner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history143 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-5
W
N/A
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
Sharon Hermanns / Donna Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2021–2027
NITA E 40W18d Oak Brook-Lukas
NITA E 40W40i Oak Brook-Lukas
CDTA E 40&OW4.0 9Hins Cashman Sun 4:30 $24
CDTA S 40&OW4.0 7.Hins Cashman Tue 6:30 $22
CDTA W 40&OW4.0 3.Hins Cashman Sun 4:30 $22
NITA E 40W18c Oak Brook-Lukas
NITA E 40W40e Oak Brook-Lukas
NITA S 40W18b Oak Brook-Lukas
NITA S 40W40c Oak Brook-Lukas
NITA S 75WCDe Score-Mountcastle
NITA W 40W18f Oak Brook-Lukas
NITA W 40W40e Oak Brook-Lukas
NITA W 75CMXc Courts Plus-Mountcastle
NITA W 75CWg Naperville-Parse/Lamb
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
57.6%
57W–42L · 52.4% of games
7.5
68.4%
13W–6L · 61.2% of games
8.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 57.5% of games
7.5mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 57.1% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
23 matches
#1 Singles
6%
8 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.