Teams

NITA S 75WCDe Score-Mountcastle

2026 NITA3 Summerz Combo Daytime · NITA Summer Daytime 7.5 Combo Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesAudra Kammerait / Jackie Smith vs Ashlyn Cullen / Sonja Anders6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJulie Roth / Shannon Ebner vs Cat Arnswald / Kate Modrow7-5, 4-1
L#3 DoublesLori Linehan / Amanda Hanlon vs Marianne Zaval / Valerie Wasilchuk6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2026-07-29vs NITA S 75WCDa Five Star-DelgrossoWon 30
W#1 DoublesAndrea Zuckerman / Audra Kammerait vs Dorothy OMalley / Cindy Monahan4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTracy Ries / Amanda Hanlon vs Mary Ellen Young / Erika Baka5-7, 5-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesToni Mountcastle / Tracy Richards vs Martha Skryd / Sue Keough6-4, 6-1
2026-07-22vs NITA S 75WCDa Five Star-DelgrossoWon 21
W#1 DoublesANDREA TAHLIER / Lori Linehan vs Jennifer Lee / MIchelle Blanco6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAmanda Hanlon / Angela Lukas vs Catherine Wasylenko / Nancy Valerio3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesToni Mountcastle / Tracy Richards vs Mary Ellen Young / Cindy Monahan6-3, 6-3
W#1 DoublesANDREA TAHLIER / Lori Linehan vs Leeandra Jaeger / Michele Kleeman6-4, 3-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesToni Mountcastle / Jackie Smith vs Cat Arnswald / Gwen Dishman7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKate Melzer / Tracy Richards vs Ashlyn Cullen / Mary Rybicki3-6, 6-5, 0-1
W#1 DoublesShannon Ebner / Andrea Zuckerman vs Robin Funk / Sharon Hermanns6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTracy Ries / Audra Kammerait vs Katrin Maldre / Natalie Thompson6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJulie Roth / Angela Lukas vs Marika Panton / Marissa Fasano7-5, 5-4
L#1 DoublesShannon Ebner / Amanda Hanlon vs Laura McEnery / Vicki Mitchell6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesToni Mountcastle / Tracy Richards vs Sarah Korreck / Patty Poorten3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAndrea Zuckerman / Kate Melzer vs Jennifer Shields / Jennifer Hazlett7-6, 6-0
2026-06-19vs NITA S 75WCDc St. Charles CC-ShieldsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTracy Richards / Katie Jones vs Vicki Mitchell / MacKenzie Danson2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTracy Ries / Audra Kammerait vs Cheri Medus / Laura McEnery6-1, 6-1
W#1 DoublesJackie Smith / Amanda Hanlon vs Deborah Poe / Carrie Cook6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTracy Richards / Toni Mountcastle vs Katrin Maldre / Natalie Thompson4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesShannon Ebner / Audra Kammerait vs Sharon Hermanns / Donna Myers6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NITA Summer Daytime 7.5 Combo Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Tracy Richards
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.81
ANDREA TAHLIER
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Shannon Ebner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.63
Tracy Ries
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Andrea Zuckerman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.45
Kate Melzer
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.44
Angela Lukas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.37
Audra Kammerait
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.26
Toni Mountcastle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.26
Amanda Hanlon
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.22
Lori Linehan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jackie Smith
published
Julie Roth
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela Lukas + Shannon Ebner2347% games+6.3% vs expected
Tracy Richards + Toni Mountcastle3257% games−0.5% vs expected
ANDREA TAHLIER + Lori Linehan7065% gamesnot enough data
Lori Linehan + Kate Melzer3346% gamesnot enough data
Julie Roth + Toni Mountcastle4159% gamesnot enough data
Angela Lukas + ANDREA TAHLIER4156% gamesnot enough data
Toni Mountcastle + Kate Melzer5069% gamesnot enough data
Tracy Ries + Andrea Zuckerman2355% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tracy Richards
113W–48L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
ANDREA TAHLIER
86W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Shannon Ebner
81W–53L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.80
4
Tracy Ries
82W–49L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
Andrea Zuckerman
77W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Kate Melzer
38W–20L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
4
Angela Lukas
97W–127L career · 2 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
3.44
3.5
Audra Kammerait
22W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Toni Mountcastle
235W–198L career · 10 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Amanda Hanlon
67W–63L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Lori Linehan
62W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Jackie Smith
54W–17L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Julie Roth
74W–51L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.