Desiree Witte
Lake Forest, IL
451 matches · 262W–189L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Desiree Witte to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history451 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
Elizabeth Burns / Allison Goldberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L
Michelle Parks / Erica White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
Michelle Parks / Kim Kuwabara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams91 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 18W4.0 9.MTB Breger Sun 4 $29
CHI E 40W4.0 10.MTB Meng Sat 2 $29
CHI E 55W8.0 5.Tam Corey Sun 1 $25
Hold Registrations #1
NITA E 40W18e Wilmette-Farinas/Nakamura
NITA E 40W40a Wilmette-Jurczyk/Dau
CDTA E 18&OW4.0 8MTB Breger Sun 4 $27
CDTA E 40&OW4.0 10MTB Meng Sat 2 $27
CDTA E 55&OW8.0 6MTB Kalina Sat 2 $27
CDTA E M18&O8.0 5MTB Koliatsis Sun 6 $27
CDTA S 18&OW4.0 8.MTB Breger Tue 6:30 $29
CDTA S 40&OW4.0 9.MTB Meng Tue 6:30 $29
CDTA S 55&OW8.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 1 $22
CDTA S ComboW8.5 4.MTB(OUT) Witte Wed 6:30 $29
CDTA W 18&OW4.0 10.MTB Breger Sun 4 $27
CDTA W 40&OW4.0 12.MTB Meng Sat 2 $27
CDTA W 55&OW8.0 3.Tam Corey Sun 1 $22
CDTA W ComboW8.5 4.MTB Witte Sun 2 $27
CDTA W M40&O8.0 3.MTB Koliatsis Sat 4 $27
NITA E 40W18a TAM-Jurczyk/Wright
NITA E 40W40a Wilmette Tennis-Jurczyk/Wright
NITA E 80W55a Schaumburg-Adams
NITA S 40W18e TAM-Jurczyk/Farinas
NITA S 40W40d Wilmette-Jurczyk/Farinas
NITA S 80W55d South Barrington-Pirron/Gray
NITA W 40W18a TAM-Jurczyk/Farinas
NITA W 40W40b Wilmette-Jurczyk/Farinas
NITA W 80W55d South Barrington-Pirron/Gray
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
68.9%
142W–64L · 58.8% of games
4.5
28.4%
23W–58L · 39.8% of games
8.0
73.5%
50W–18L · 60.5% of games
8.5
46.2%
24W–28L · 50.7% of games
8.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 44.6% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
176 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
116 matches
#1 Singles
18%
80 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
67 matches
#2 Singles
2%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
4 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.