← Search

Rachel Fuller

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chicago, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
114 matches · 53W–61L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history114 matches
W
2026-11-01 · CHI E 40W4.0 2.RT Fuller Sun 12 $29 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Maloney
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-10-25 · CHI E 18W3.5 8.ACN Bergman Sun 5 $24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Virginia Kosenkova
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-5
W
2026-10-24 · CHI E 40W4.0 2.RT Fuller Sun 12 $29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Maloney
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-10-18 · CHI E 18W3.5 8.ACN Bergman Sun 5 $24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mio Dahlquist
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-10-18 · CHI E 40W4.0 2.RT Fuller Sun 12 $29 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Maloney
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-09-13 · CHI E 40W4.0 2.RT Fuller Sun 12 $29 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Losasso
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-4
L
2026-09-13 · CHI E 18W4.0 7.ACN Bergman Sun 5 $24 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jillian Morrison
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-11 · CDTA S TriWLo 5.RT Ford Sat 2 $27 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Michelle Ramker
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-08 · CDTA S 18&OW3.5 7.Nielsen Bergman Sun 3 $22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Terry championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-08 · CDTA S 18&OW3.5 7.Nielsen Bergman Sun 3 $22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elise Bergman championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-01 · CDTA S 18&OW3.5 7.Nielsen Bergman Sun 3 $22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Baker championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-08-01 · CDTA S 18&OW3.5 7.Nielsen Bergman Sun 3 $22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maureen Maher championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
80%
4W–1L · 52% of games
3.0
37.5%
9W–15L · 47.6% of games
3.5
53.1%
17W–15L · 53.3% of games
4.0
47.2%
17W–19L · 48.5% of games
7.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 55% of games
7.5mixed
0%
0W–5L · 36.6% of games
8.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 41.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
23 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King