Emily Lund
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chicago, IL
492 matches · 316W–176L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history492 matches
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams167 teams · 2019–2027
CHI E 18W3.5 1.Wilm Lund Sun 1 $25
CHI E 18W4.0 6.Tam Lund Sat 3 $25
CHI E 40W3.5 1.Tam Lund Sat 1 $25
CHI E 40W4.0 1.Tam Lund Sun 1 $25
CHI E M18.7.0 5.McF Baltazar Fri 8 $25
CHI E M40.7.0 4.McF Baltazar Sat 6 $25
NITA E 40W18b Score-Odenbeck
CDTA E 18&OW3.5 3Cent Lund Sun 1 $22
CDTA E 18&OW4.0 2Tam Lund Sat 3 $22
CDTA E 40&OW3.5 4Tam Lund Sat 1 $22
CDTA E 40&OW4.0 8Tam Lund Sun 1 $22
CDTA E M18&O7.0 6McFet Baltazar Fri 8 $25
CDTA S 18&OW3.5 4.Wilm Lund Thu 7 $22
CDTA S 18&OW4.0 1.Tam Lund Tue 7 $22
CDTA S 40&OW3.5 5.Tam Lund Mon 7 $22
CDTA S 40&OW4.0 2.Tam Lund Thu 7 $22
CDTA S ComboW6.5 3.Nbk Shin Sat 10 $28
CDTA S ComboX7.5 8.McFet Baltazar Sun 3 $25
CDTA S M18&O7.0 5.McFet Baltazar Sat 5 $25
CDTA S TriWLo 7.Gnvw Baltazar Tue 7 $21
CDTA S TriWMid 8.Gnvw Baltazar Tue 7 $21
CDTA W 18&OW3.5 8.Wlmt Lund Sun 1 $22
CDTA W 18&OW4.0 4.Tam Lund Sat 3 $22
CDTA W 40&OW3.5 5.Tam Lund Sat 1 $22
CDTA W 40&OW4.0 5.Tam Lund Sun 1 $22
CDTA W ComboW6.5 3.Gnvw Shin Sun 3 $21
CDTA W ComboW7.5 4.Herit Eisner Sun 3 $25
CDTA W ComboX7.5 7.McFet Baltazar Sat 6 $25
CDTA W TriWLo 5.Gnvw Baltazar Sat 3 $21
CDTA W TriWMid 3.Gnvw Baltazaar Sat 3 $21
CHI F CW6.5 4.Gnvw Shin Sun 3 $21
CHI F CX7.5 8.Gnvw Baltazar Sat 5 $21
NITA E 35W40e Wilmette-Lam
NITA E 40W40c River Trails-Lund/Lam
NITA F 65CWa Challenge-Keane/Klosterman
NITA F 75CWb Wilmette-Wright/Nakamura
NITA S 75WCg Wilmette-Wright/Nakamura
NITA W 75CWe Wilmette-Wright/Nakamura
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 55.5% of games
3.0
25%
1W–3L · 43.1% of games
3.5
68.1%
175W–82L · 56.5% of games
4.0
54.7%
29W–24L · 55.3% of games
6.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 54.4% of games
7.5
45.8%
22W–26L · 49.4% of games
7.0mixed
75.6%
59W–19L · 59.7% of games
7.5mixed
50%
13W–13L · 48.3% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
200 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
168 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
117 matches
#1 Singles
1%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Pressure is a privilege.