← Search

Eileen Lee

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chicago, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
293 matches · 154W–139L · seasons 2018–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2025. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history293 matches
L
2026-04-19 · CDTA W ComboW7.5 2.Tam Corey Fri 7:30 $22 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rosemary Swierk
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-18 · CDTA W TriWMid 3.Gnvw Baltazaar Sat 3 $21 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marjorie Baltazar
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-13 · NITA W 75CWe Wilmette-Wright/Nakamura · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elise Bergman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-04-12 · CDTA W TriWMid 3.Gnvw Baltazaar Sat 3 $21 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jean Soh
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-06 · NITA W 75CWe Wilmette-Wright/Nakamura · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rochelle Probst
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-03-29 · CDTA W ComboW8.5 1.Wlmt Thompson Sun 11 $22 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Silvia Kusaka
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-03-06 · NITA W 75CWe Wilmette-Wright/Nakamura · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mio Dahlquist
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-02-27 · CDTA W ComboW7.5 2.Tam Corey Fri 7:30 $22 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rosemary Swierk
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-22 · CDTA W ComboW8.5 1.Wlmt Thompson Sun 11 $22 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Christine Meade
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-02-21 · CDTA W TriWMid 3.Gnvw Baltazaar Sat 3 $21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Grace Kuhrt
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-08 · CDTA W 18&OW4.0 4.Tam Lund Sat 3 $22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sue Wissing
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-5, 1-0
W
2026-02-08 · CDTA W 18&OW4.0 4.Tam Lund Sat 3 $22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pamela Leichtling
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams81 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
40%
4W–6L · 49.7% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
57.4%
85W–63L · 53.8% of games
4.5
0%
0W–5L · 34.9% of games
7.5
47.7%
21W–23L · 50.9% of games
8.5
57.9%
33W–24L · 51.8% of games
7.5mixed
42.9%
9W–12L · 53.2% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
114 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
98 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
75 matches
#1 Singles
1%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer