← Search

Nicole Borck

New Lenox, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
154 matches · 73W–81L · seasons 2020–2027

Captains: add Nicole Borck to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history154 matches
L
2026-09-13 · NITA E 35W18a Challenge-Burk · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Gross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-09 · #1 Doubles · with Kathie Melean championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-09 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
Shannon Morel / Julia Costello
2026-07-30 · NITA S 65WCb Challenge-Keane · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cathy Abbott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
Lina Kamenev / Katie Jones
2026-07-25 · #4 Doubles · with Sheila Bai championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-25 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
Laura Knapp
2026-07-19 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-17 · NITA S 35W40 Park Forest-Bai/Young · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-14 · NITA S 35W40 Park Forest-Bai/Young · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelley Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-09 · NITA S 35W40 Park Forest-Bai/Young · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sylvia Loo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-1, 0-1
W
2026-06-29 · NITA S 65WCb Challenge-Keane · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cathy Abbott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · NITA W TLW40b Challenge-Burk · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsay Briski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
85.7%
18W–3L · 62.5% of games
3.5
39.4%
43W–66L · 45.5% of games
6.5
60%
3W–2L · 50% of games
7.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 41% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 56.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 57% of the time
#1 Singles
57%
88 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
5%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe