Janet Juarez
Naperville, IL
196 matches · 84W–112L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Janet Juarez to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history196 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-7, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2021–2027
NITA E 30W18c Five Star-Schwandt
NITA E 35W40k Rush Copley-Saxe/Schwartz
NITA E 70W55b Rush Copley-Adams
NITA S 30W18e Five Star-Schwandt
NITA S 35W18c Rush Copley-Saxe/Schwartz
NITA S 65WCDa Five Star-Delgrosso
NITA S 65WCa Five Star-Delgrosso
NITA W 30W18a Five Star-Schwandt
NITA W 35W40l Rush Copley-Saxe/Schwartz
NITA W 65CWDa Five Star-Delgrosso
NITA W 65CWb Five Star-Delgrosso
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
71%
44W–18L · 59% of games
3.5
31%
13W–29L · 45.1% of games
6.5
29.4%
10W–24L · 45.7% of games
7.0
26.1%
12W–34L · 40.8% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
86 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
77 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
33 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.