← Search

Zareen Hassan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Naperville, IL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
16 matches · 1W–15L · seasons 2023–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2027. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history16 matches
L
2026-11-01 · NITA E 30W40a Naperville-Frogameni/Costantino · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ali Frogameni
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-18 · NITA E 30W40a Naperville-Frogameni/Costantino · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alyse Bergmann
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-04-26 · NITA W 30W18h Naperville-Bianchi · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nikki Costantino
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-04-19 · NITA W 30W18h Naperville-Bianchi · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Fonash
loading the estimate
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-15 · NITA W 30W18h Naperville-Bianchi · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Wolfkiel
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-28 · NITA W 30W18h Naperville-Bianchi · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Whitney Adams
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-15 · NITA W 30W18h Naperville-Bianchi · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Betty Mikula
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-4
L
2025-09-21 · NITA E 35W40i Rush Copley-Hanlon/Gudgeon · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Wade
loading the estimate
6-7, 0-6
L
2025-03-09 · NITA W 35W40f Rush Copley-Hanlon/Gudgeon · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth O'Toole
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-02-09 · NITA W 35W40f Rush Copley-Hanlon/Gudgeon · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelley OBrien
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-10-30 · NITA F 65CWDd Rush Copley-Hanlon · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Bartels
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
L
2024-10-15 · NITA F 65CWDd Rush Copley-Hanlon · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Pilmer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 35.5% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5
0%
0W–4L · 30% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 56% of the time
#3 Doubles
56%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal