← Search

Lisa Sanderson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sycamore, IL
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
64 matches · 19W–45L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history64 matches
L
2026-11-01 · NITA E 35W40j Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Sleezer
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-04 · NITA E 35W40j Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynne Schwartz
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-27 · NITA E 35W40j Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Betsy Dettro
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-14 · NITA S 35W40 Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Larissa Podstavkova
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-10 · NITA S 35W40 Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Jesseman
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-4
L
2026-06-23 · NITA S 35W40 Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ella Lord
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-09 · NITA S 35W40 Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Strien
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-02 · NITA S 35W40 Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ella Lord
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-04-20 · NITA W 75CWg Norris-Prendergast/Sleezer · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jane Strien
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2023-11-12 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Maska
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
L
2023-09-15 · NITA F 75CWf Norris (Prendergast/Sleezer) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Valerie Patterson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-5
L
2023-07-21 · NITA S 75CWDc Norris (Prendergast/Sleezer) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ella Lord
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
25%
2W–6L · 39.6% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
39.3%
11W–17L · 45.7% of games
8.0
23.1%
6W–20L · 38.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer