← Search

Valerie Patterson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ottawa, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
75 matches · 17W–58L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history75 matches
L
2026-11-01 · NITA E 35W40j Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Edwards
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-6
L
2026-10-25 · NITA E 80MX40b Vaughan-Elliot/Cole · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Cranley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-18 · NITA E 35W40j Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Edwards
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-10-10 · NITA E 80MX40b Vaughan-Elliot/Cole · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Cole mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-04 · NITA E 35W40j Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Sleezer
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-02 · NITA E 80MX40b Vaughan-Elliot/Cole · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Aaron Kramer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-5, 0-1
W
2026-09-27 · NITA E 35W40j Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Strien
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-04-26 · NITA W 65CWc Vaughan-Brosnan · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Donna Borse
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-12 · NITA W 65CWc Vaughan-Brosnan · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kelsey Robb
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-29 · NITA W 65CWc Vaughan-Brosnan · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Diann Bilderback
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-22 · NITA W 65CWc Vaughan-Brosnan · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Diann Bilderback
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-03-22 · NITA W 35W40j Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patty Poorten
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
50%
5W–5L · 48.1% of games
4.0
12.5%
2W–14L · 30.3% of games
6.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.6% of games
7.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 42.7% of games
8.0
20%
1W–4L · 36.8% of games
8.0mixed
11.5%
3W–23L · 37.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
18 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer