← Search

Jane Strien

Aurora, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
210 matches · 154W–56L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jane Strien to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history210 matches
L
2026-07-10 · NITA S 35W40 Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Kakuska
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-27 · NITA S 35W40 Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Jurcenko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
Jessica Barnes / Sylvia Loo
2026-06-23 · NITA S 35W40 Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Jurcenko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-09 · NITA S 35W40 Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Sanderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-02 · NITA S 35W40 Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Kirtley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-05-27 · NITA S 35W40 Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Kakuska
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-22 · NITA W 35W40j Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Kakuska
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
Jessica Barnes / Sheila Bai
2026-03-07 · NITA W 35W40j Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Ludwig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-20 · NITA W 35W40j Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Valerie Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-15 · NITA W 35W40j Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Valerie Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-4
W
N/A
2025-11-23 · NITA E 40W40g Vaughan-Sleezer/Medus · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Valerie Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-10-12 · NITA E 40W40g Vaughan-Sleezer/Medus · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Valerie Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 51.1% of games
3.5
60.9%
28W–18L · 54.3% of games
4.0
55%
11W–9L · 51.9% of games
6.5
96%
24W–1L · 71.7% of games
7.0
90%
54W–6L · 66.9% of games
7.5
80%
12W–3L · 62.2% of games
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
100 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
71 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
34 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert