← Search

Linda Ludwig

St Charles, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
74 matches · 42W–32L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Linda Ludwig to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history74 matches
L
2026-07-14 · NITA S 35W40 Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patty Poorten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-09 · NITA S 35W40 Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Larissa Podstavkova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-05-27 · NITA S 35W40 Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Klein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
Jessica Barnes / Sheila Bai
2026-03-07 · NITA W 35W40j Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Strien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-01 · NITA W 35W40j Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patty Poorten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
Anne Ruden / Lori Brown
2026-02-15 · NITA W 35W40j Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patty Poorten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-11-16 · NITA E 35W40j Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with MacKenzie Danson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-11-02 · NITA E 35W40j Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Klein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-19 · NITA S 35W40L Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Peskind
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2025-06-10 · NITA S 35W40L Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patty Poorten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-4, 1-0
L
2025-05-27 · NITA S 35W40L Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michele Locascio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-03-16 · NITA W 35W40j Vaughan-Sleezer/Jurcenko · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Lagman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
56.1%
32W–25L · 54.8% of games
7.5
70%
7W–3L · 61.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
16 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams