← Search

Amy Harper

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Woodridge, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
195 matches · 79W–116L · seasons 2018–2025
Match history195 matches
L
2025-11-09 · NITA E 70W55e Challenge-Sharp · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindy Monahan
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-12 · NITA E 35W40i Rush Copley-Hanlon/Gudgeon · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Wiet
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-05 · NITA E 70W55e Challenge-Sharp · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindy Monahan
loading the estimate
0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-09-28 · NITA E 70W55e Challenge-Sharp · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cynthia Knox
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
W
2025-09-21 · NITA E 35W40i Rush Copley-Hanlon/Gudgeon · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maureen Henderson
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-08-13 · NITA S 70W55a Challenge-Sharp · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Denise Rippetoe-Reed
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-08-10 · NITA S 75CWb Five Star-Delgrosso · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Colleen Doyle
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-14 · NITA S 75CWb Five Star-Delgrosso · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Martha Skryd
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-07-09 · NITA S 35W40b Five Star-Delgrosso · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Tassi
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
W
2025-07-02 · NITA S 75CWb Five Star-Delgrosso · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laura Maslowski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-06-30 · NITA S 70W55a Challenge-Sharp · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cynthia Knox
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-3, 0-1
W
2025-06-24 · NITA S 70W55a Challenge-Sharp · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Geri Harston
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams63 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
44.4%
20W–25L · 46.7% of games
4.0
35.7%
10W–18L · 46.3% of games
7.0
48.8%
20W–21L · 51.6% of games
7.5
40.5%
17W–25L · 47% of games
8.0
38.9%
7W–11L · 46% of games
8.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
27.8%
5W–13L · 43.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
90 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
64 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
41 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova