← Search

Tracy Reese

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Naperville, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
163 matches · 113W–50L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history163 matches
W
2026-10-30 · NITA E 35W40a Naperville-Gabel · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Apicella
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-10-25 · NITA E 35W40a Naperville-Gabel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Chapman
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-10-17 · NITA E 70W55c Naperville-Sheridan/Ruden · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori Toney
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-10-10 · NITA E 70W55c Naperville-Sheridan/Ruden · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christine Lee
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-10-09 · NITA E 35W40a Naperville-Gabel · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Chapman
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-19 · NITA E 70W55c Naperville-Sheridan/Ruden · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Sheridan
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-09-11 · NITA E 35W40a Naperville-Gabel · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynn Park
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-29 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carolyn Burger championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-28 · NITA S 70W55e Naperville-Sheridan/Ruden · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christine Lee
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-01 · NITA S 70W55e Naperville-Sheridan/Ruden · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Yacullo
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · NITA S 35W40 Naperville-Gabel · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Betsy Feldmann
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-15 · NITA S 35W40 Naperville-Gabel · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Apicella
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
68.6%
72W–33L · 56.6% of games
7.0
81%
34W–8L · 62.4% of games
7.5
43.8%
7W–9L · 46.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
74 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
54 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
23 matches
#1 Singles
7%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert