← Search

Pam Kuchan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Elmhurst, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
56 matches · 28W–28L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history56 matches
L
2026-07-28 · NITA S 70W55b Courts Plus-Barsotti/Roth · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vanessa Clohessy
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-01 · NITA S 70W55b Courts Plus-Barsotti/Roth · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Ventrella
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-08 · NITA W 65CWDd Courts Plus-Mountcastle · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Meghan Hood
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-18 · NITA W 65CWDd Courts Plus-Mountcastle · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anne Rago Hackett
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-25 · NITA W 65CWDd Courts Plus-Mountcastle · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christine Juneman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-5
L
2026-02-11 · NITA W 65CWDd Courts Plus-Mountcastle · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jane Loeser
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
W
2025-07-31 · NITA S 70W55c Courts Plus-Bursch/Roth · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Ventrella
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-3
L
2025-07-09 · NITA S 65CWDc Courts Plus-Mountcastle · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Aletta Dornhof
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-23 · NITA S 70W55c Courts Plus-Bursch/Roth · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patty Vicari
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-7
W
2025-06-16 · NITA S 70W55c Courts Plus-Bursch/Roth · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Trimble
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-2
L
2025-06-10 · NITA S 70W55c Courts Plus-Bursch/Roth · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patty Vicari
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-06-04 · NITA S 65CWDc Courts Plus-Mountcastle · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Meghan Hood
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
6.5
38.1%
8W–13L · 46.7% of games
7.0
63.3%
19W–11L · 53.8% of games
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 44.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
45%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams