← Search

Lisa Korte

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Naperville, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
179 matches · 104W–75L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history179 matches
L
2026-10-31 · NITA E 80MX40c Naperville-Podwika · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robin Kiamco mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-10-17 · NITA E 70W55e Rush Copley-Gudeon/Wolf · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelley OBrien
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-10-10 · NITA E 70W55e Rush Copley-Gudeon/Wolf · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with DONNA SAGER
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-26 · NITA W 80MX40c Naperville-Podwika · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Laurx mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-03-27 · NITA W 80MX55a Naperville-Podwika · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Maxson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-03-08 · NITA W 35W40g Rush Copley-Hanlon/Gudgeon · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbi Landorf
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-03-06 · NITA W 80MX55a Naperville-Podwika · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Maxson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-31 · NITA W 80MX40c Naperville-Podwika · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Deniz Karacay mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-01-25 · NITA W 35W40g Rush Copley-Hanlon/Gudgeon · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbi Landorf
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-12-06 · NITA E 80MX40a Naperville-Podwika · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Deniz Karacay mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-12-05 · NITA E 80MX40a Naperville-Podwika · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Laurx mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-07 · NITA E 80MX40a Naperville-Podwika · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Laurx mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams73 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
50%
2W–2L · 44% of games
3.5
56.2%
18W–14L · 51.9% of games
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 34.2% of games
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 55.1% of games
7.0
58.8%
20W–14L · 52.4% of games
7.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 48.4% of games
8.0
0%
0W–6L · 27.3% of games
7.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
71.1%
59W–24L · 56% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
81 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
47 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert