← Search

Debbi Landorf

Naperville, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
270 matches · 191W–79L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Debbi Landorf to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history270 matches
L
2026-07-29 · NITA S 75WCf Wheaton-LaBue/Reese · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lori Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-07 · NITA S 75WCf Wheaton-LaBue/Reese · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Molly McGinnis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
N/A
2026-04-24 · NITA W 80MX55a Naperville-Podwika · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robin Kiamco mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
N/A
2026-04-24 · NITA W 80MX40c Naperville-Podwika · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Maxson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-03-14 · #3 Doubles · with John Laurx championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-03-13 · #3 Doubles · with John Laurx championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-08 · NITA W 35W40g Rush Copley-Hanlon/Gudgeon · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Korte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-06 · NITA W 80MX55a Naperville-Podwika · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bill Bowman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-02-06 · NITA W 80MX55a Naperville-Podwika · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bill Bowman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-01-30 · NITA W 80MX55a Naperville-Podwika · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Laurx mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-01-25 · NITA W 35W40g Rush Copley-Hanlon/Gudgeon · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Korte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-01-24 · #3 Doubles · with John Laurx championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
60%
24W–16L · 53.4% of games
4.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 43.4% of games
7.0
70%
21W–9L · 56.7% of games
7.5
56%
14W–11L · 53.2% of games
8.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
79.7%
110W–28L · 61.1% of games
8.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
106 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
92 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
59 matches
#1 Singles
5%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams