← Search

Brad Stieber

Clawson, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
240 matches · 183W–57L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Brad Stieber to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history240 matches
W
2026-08-31 · SCWB- Tagawa 6.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Yasuko Tagawa mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-26 · SCWB- Tagawa 6.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Louise Brekke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-24 · WESS-Baslock 7.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kim Baslock mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-17 · WESS-Baslock 7.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Marianne Schouten mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-05 · WESS-Baslock 7.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kim Baslock mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
Frank Doherty / Miles Jamieson
2026-08-02 · #3 Doubles · with Bikramjeet Singh championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Bikramjeet Singh championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-31 · FAC-Stieber 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Boike mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-29 · DTC-Ostrovsky 55s 8.0M F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bob Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-26 · #3 Doubles · with Bikramjeet Singh championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-25 · DTC-Ostrovsky 55s 8.0M F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Gallagher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-07-22 · LIB-Kornfeld 18s 3.5M F4 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Chaize
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
67.7%
21W–10L · 57.1% of games
4.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 48.8% of games
6.5
92.3%
12W–1L · 68.3% of games
7.0
94.4%
17W–1L · 63.9% of games
7.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 60% of games
8.0
75%
6W–2L · 58% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
86.2%
50W–8L · 64.8% of games
7.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 57% of games
8.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 54.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
117 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
52 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova