← Search

Timothy Harry

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Waterford, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
173 matches · 80W–93L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history173 matches
L
2026-10-23 · DEER-Kerin 8.5M Weekend Combo F · #2 Doubles · with Trenton Townsend
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-04 · WESS-Muhn 8.0X 55 & O F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dana Heming mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-04 · BOH-Fredericks 18s 8.0X F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Erin Robinson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-31 · DEER-Throgmorton 18s 4.0M F3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Seilkop championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-29 · PINE-Kalil (inside) 55s 8.0M F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeffrey Seilkop
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-28 · PINE-Kalil (inside) 55s 8.0M F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dan Christ
loading the estimate
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-24 · BOH-Fredericks 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nisha Jam mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-23 · LT- Edwards 55s 9.0M · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with JJ Schmidt
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-02 · LT- Edwards 55s 9.0M · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jeff Oparka
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-25 · LT- Edwards 55s 9.0M · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jeff Oparka
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-24 · PINE-Kalil (inside) 55s 8.0M F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Neff
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-17 · PINE-Kalil (inside) 55s 8.0M F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Nagle
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
63.2%
24W–14L · 57.7% of games
4.5
17.4%
4W–19L · 38% of games
7.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 54.7% of games
8.0
63.6%
14W–8L · 55.8% of games
8.5
0%
0W–4L · 41.3% of games
9.0
42.3%
11W–15L · 47.3% of games
8.0mixed
56.2%
18W–14L · 51.2% of games
9.0mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 34.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
78 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
56 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
30 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova