← Search

Robert Nagle

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
197 matches · 118W–79L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history197 matches
W
2026-10-25 · WESS-Muhn 8.0X 55 & O F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Vogt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-10-18 · BHC-Uhlar 8.5M Weekend Combo F · #3 Doubles · with Brian Wayne
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-08-29 · BOH-Fredericks 18s 8.0X F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Erin Robinson mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-29 · BOH-Fredericks 18s 8.0X F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Erin Robinson mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-19 · SCWB-Tanguay 8.5 COMBO MIX · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Barbara Friesen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-17 · SCWB-Tanguay 8.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Naoko McKelvey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-08-11 · BOH-Fredericks 18s 8.0X F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Colette Comeau mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-08-04 · BOH-Fredericks 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Piper Copeland mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-03 · SCWB-Tanguay 8.5 COMBO MIX · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hilary Hayden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-29 · PINE-Kalil (inside) 55s 8.0M F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mahesh Lunani
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-23 · PINE-Kalil (inside) 55s 8.0M F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Edward Pollak
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-23 · FAC-Bez 55s 9.0M · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Stephen Herdoiza
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams66 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
67.9%
19W–9L · 60.4% of games
4.5
55%
33W–27L · 52.1% of games
8.0
72%
18W–7L · 60.1% of games
8.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0
60%
3W–2L · 58.2% of games
8.0mixed
64.3%
27W–15L · 55.4% of games
8.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 41.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
64 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
54 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
13 matches
Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe