← Search

Christina Slade

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
PLYMOUTH, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
378 matches · 266W–112L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history378 matches
W
2026-11-01 · #1 Doubles · with Chelsea Doyle
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-25 · CHIP-Howard 8.0X 55 & O F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Varner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-10-24 · #3 Doubles · with Hilary Hayden
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-23 · #3 Doubles · with Becky Cleason
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-10 · #1 Doubles · with Erica Frantz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-10-09 · #1 Doubles · with Aubrey Pavlik
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-04 · CHIP-Howard 8.0X 55 & O F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Todd Schalk mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-10-03 · #3 Doubles · with Christine Kim
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-09-26 · CHIP-Slade 18s 8.0X F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joseph Formicola mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-09-26 · CHIP-Slade 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joseph Formicola mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-09-25 · CHIP-Slade 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joseph Formicola mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-09-19 · CHIP-Slade 18s 8.0X F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joseph Formicola mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams85 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level17 levels played
0.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 56.6% of games
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
87%
20W–3L · 65.8% of games
4.0
77.2%
95W–28L · 60% of games
4.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 42.6% of games
6.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 64.1% of games
7.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
64.3%
27W–15L · 57.1% of games
8.0
80%
8W–2L · 60.3% of games
8.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 48.3% of games
9.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 62.2% of games
7.0mixed
78.6%
11W–3L · 56.4% of games
7.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
66.2%
51W–26L · 54.6% of games
8.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
47.4%
9W–10L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
177 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
120 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
71 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
5 matches
Singles
1%
4 matches
#3 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert