← Search

Lisa Burke

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
HOLLAND, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
102 matches · 70W–32L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history102 matches
W
2026-10-25 · NWO 8.5W Combo Pacella/Spinazze-TWOS · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jessica Vietmeier
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-4
L
2026-09-26 · NWO 18&Over 8.0MX Connors/Dominiak-TWOS · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Charles Green mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-25 · NWO 18&Over 8.0MX Connors/Dominiak-TWOS · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Charles Green mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-09-20 · NWO 18&Over 8.0MX Connors/Dominiak-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jack Burke mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-20 · NWO 18&Over 8.0MX Connors/Dominiak-TWOS · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jack Burke mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-09-13 · NWO 18&Over 8.0MX Connors/Dominiak-TWOS · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jack Burke mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-09 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W Vietmeier/Campbell-TWOS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Vietmeier
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-25 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W Vietmeier/Campbell-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie MacMillan
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-04 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W Vietmeier/Campbell-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Vietmeier
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-28 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W Vietmeier/Campbell-TWOS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Vietmeier
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-21 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W Vietmeier/Campbell-TWOS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Vietmeier
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-05-15 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W Vietmeier/Campbell-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Vietmeier
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 66.4% of games
4.0
71.7%
33W–13L · 60.2% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 55.9% of games
8.0mixed
64%
16W–9L · 53.2% of games
9.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 43.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
22 matches
#1 Singles
5%
5 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams