← Search

Sarah Ward

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sylvania, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
392 matches · 212W–180L · seasons 2015–2026
Match history392 matches
L
2026-09-27 · NWO 55&Over 8.0W Allen/Nixon-SVC · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carrie Zanville championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-26 · NWO 7.5W Combo Kapuscinski- · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shelly Gottschalk
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-26 · NWO 55&Over 8.0W Allen/Nixon-SVC · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chahnaz Almadfae Haidar championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-20 · NWO 55&Over 8.0W Allen/Nixon-SVC · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chahnaz Almadfae Haidar championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-25 · NWO 55&Over 8.0W Allen/Nixon-SVC · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Renee Allen
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-08-24 · NWO 55&Over 8.0W Allen/Nixon-SVC · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chahnaz Almadfae Haidar
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-08 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W Kraus/Sanderson-SVC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Nixon championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-07 · NWO 40&Over 4.0W Sanderson/Kraus-SVC · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chahnaz Almadfae Haidar championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-03 · NWO 55&Over 8.0W Allen/Nixon-SVC · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chahnaz Almadfae Haidar
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-28 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W Kraus/Sanderson-SVC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chahnaz Almadfae Haidar
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-27 · NWO 55&Over 8.0W Allen/Nixon-SVC · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Emily Nixon
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-23 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W Kraus/Sanderson-SVC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Nixon
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
69.5%
41W–18L · 58.3% of games
4.0
51.7%
93W–87L · 52.8% of games
4.5
50%
2W–2L · 41.7% of games
7.5
52.9%
27W–24L · 52.6% of games
8.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 41.4% of games
8.5
60%
12W–8L · 55.8% of games
7.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 47% of games
8.0mixed
45.8%
22W–26L · 52% of games
9.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 52.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
133 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
105 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
75 matches
#1 Singles
11%
43 matches
#2 Singles
6%
23 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer