← Search

Theresa Vietmeier

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Wauseon, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
419 matches · 189W–230L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history419 matches
L
2026-10-25 · NWO 8.5W Combo Pacella/Spinazze-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Shawna Dippman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-5
L
2026-10-24 · NWO 7.5W Combo Szczechowski · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Denise Sottek
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-3
L
2026-10-17 · NWO 7.5W Combo Szczechowski · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Yue Gu
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-3, 0-1
W
2026-10-10 · NWO 7.5W Combo Szczechowski · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Yue Gu
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-09-26 · NWO 7.5W Combo Szczechowski · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Denise Sottek
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-25 · NWO 55&Over 8.0W Vietmeier/Pacella-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Morgan
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
W
N/A
2026-08-13 · NWO 55&Over 7.0W DAY Bloomquist-AW · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marayart Li
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-10 · NWO 55&Over 8.0W Vietmeier/Pacella-TWOS · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Morgan
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-28 · NWO 40&Over 4.0W Loeb -TWOS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julieann Campbell
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-21 · NWO 40&Over 4.0W Loeb -TWOS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracy Mauntler
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-16 · NWO 55&Over 7.0W DAY Bloomquist-AW · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jackie Kapuscinski
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-14 · NWO 40&Over 4.0W Loeb -TWOS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracy Mauntler
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams63 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
48.7%
95W–100L · 49.8% of games
4.5
0%
0W–4L · 30% of games
6.5
60%
6W–4L · 52.7% of games
7.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 53.4% of games
7.5
37.5%
18W–30L · 47.4% of games
8.0
19%
4W–17L · 43% of games
8.5
50%
19W–19L · 49.3% of games
7.0mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 54.9% of games
8.0mixed
42.1%
32W–44L · 45.4% of games
9.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 37.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
141 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
127 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
123 matches
#1 Singles
4%
16 matches
#2 Singles
2%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams