← Search

Shawna Dippman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Toledo, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
304 matches · 226W–78L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history304 matches
L
2026-10-31 · NWO 7.5W Combo Bastas/Keating-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelsey Schwanz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-10-25 · NWO 8.5W Combo Pacella/Spinazze-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Theresa Vietmeier
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-5
L
2026-10-17 · NWO 7.5W Combo Bastas/Keating-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alison Herrick
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-26 · NWO 7.5W Combo Bastas/Keating-TWOS · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelsey Schwanz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-09-20 · NWO 18&Over 7.0MX Bastas/Dippman-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jordan Swick mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-09-13 · NWO 18&Over 7.0MX Bastas/Dippman-TWOS · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jordan Swick mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-07-28 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W Keating/Zinz-AW · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelsey Schwanz
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-21 · NWO 40&Over 4.0W Zinz/Feltner-AW · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Gauthier
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-07 · NWO 40&Over 4.0W Zinz/Feltner-AW · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Jo French
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-23 · NWO 40&Over 4.0W Zinz/Feltner-AW · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Abell
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-16 · NWO 40&Over 4.0W Zinz/Feltner-AW · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kate Keating
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-11 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W Keating/Zinz-AW · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kate Keating
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 65.7% of games
3.0
72.2%
13W–5L · 67% of games
3.5
90%
27W–3L · 67.2% of games
4.0
52.9%
27W–24L · 49.2% of games
5.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
90.9%
30W–3L · 68.2% of games
7.5
64.5%
20W–11L · 58.2% of games
8.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 46.8% of games
6.0mixed
94.7%
18W–1L · 74.3% of games
7.0mixed
74.5%
41W–14L · 60.6% of games
8.0mixed
77.8%
35W–10L · 57.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
131 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
93 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
59 matches
#1 Singles
4%
12 matches
#2 Singles
3%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer