← Search

Didi Thomason

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Perrysburg, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
228 matches · 124W–104L · seasons 2016–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2026. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history228 matches
W
2026-10-11 · NWO 8.5W Combo Pacella/Spinazze-TWOS · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kimberly Pacella
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-1
W
2026-09-27 · NWO 18&Over 8.0MX Connors/Dominiak-TWOS · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Charles Green mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-09-27 · NWO 18&Over 8.0MX Connors/Dominiak-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Charles Green mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-20 · NWO 18&Over 9.0MX Pacella-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jesse MacDonald mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-25 · NWO 55&Over 8.0W Vietmeier/Pacella-TWOS · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dana Loeb
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-10 · NWO 55&Over 8.0W Vietmeier/Pacella-TWOS · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dana Loeb
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-28 · NWO 40&Over 4.0W Loeb -TWOS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Stearns
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-27 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W Vietmeier/Campbell-TWOS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Grace Reiter
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-21 · NWO 40&Over 4.0W Loeb -TWOS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patti Savage-McNamara
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-20 · NWO 55&Over 8.0W Vietmeier/Pacella-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dana Loeb
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-14 · NWO 40&Over 4.0W Loeb -TWOS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Johnson
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-23 · NWO 40&Over 4.0W Loeb -TWOS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julieann Campbell
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
57%
65W–49L · 52.6% of games
4.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 43% of games
7.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 47.9% of games
8.0
30%
3W–7L · 41.8% of games
8.5
51.3%
20W–19L · 48.6% of games
7.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 56.2% of games
8.0mixed
55.6%
10W–8L · 50.2% of games
9.0mixed
73.7%
14W–5L · 58.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
92 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
77 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
59 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer