← Search

Julieann Campbell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sylvania, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
203 matches · 133W–70L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history203 matches
W
Default
2026-11-01 · NWO 8.5W Combo Pacella/Spinazze-TWOS · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kathleen Delp
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-10-04 · NWO 8.5W Combo Pacella/Spinazze-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kimberly Pacella
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-28 · NWO 40&Over 4.0W Loeb -TWOS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Theresa Vietmeier
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-27 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W Vietmeier/Campbell-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Johnson
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-21 · NWO 40&Over 4.0W Loeb -TWOS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Johnson
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-14 · NWO 40&Over 4.0W Loeb -TWOS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Reisert
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-07-09 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W Vietmeier/Campbell-TWOS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Reisert
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
Default
2026-06-25 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W Vietmeier/Campbell-TWOS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alison Herrick
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-23 · NWO 40&Over 4.0W Loeb -TWOS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Didi Thomason
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-18 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W Vietmeier/Campbell-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Vietmeier
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-16 · NWO 40&Over 4.0W Loeb -TWOS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Johnson
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-02 · NWO 40&Over 4.0W Loeb -TWOS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Theresa Vietmeier
loading the estimate
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 59.4% of games
4.0
62%
67W–41L · 56.4% of games
7.5
60.6%
20W–13L · 56.8% of games
8.5
90.3%
28W–3L · 67.1% of games
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
40%
6W–9L · 46.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
75 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
49 matches
#1 Singles
19%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
29 matches
#2 Singles
6%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert