← Search

Cari Gauld

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Perrysburg, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
188 matches · 137W–51L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history188 matches
W
2026-10-27 · NWO 6.5W Combo Tues Wittenmyer-PTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jamie Smeltzer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-3
W
2026-10-24 · NWO 7.5W Combo Kirby/Irwin-PTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ann Miller
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-10-10 · NWO 7.5W Combo Kirby/Irwin-PTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ann Miller
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 0-5
L
2026-09-12 · NWO 40&Over 7.0MX Lewis-PTC · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rick Busselle mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelsie Hoagland championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jillian Kirby championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-07-29 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W Kirby/Gottschalk-FT · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelsie Hoagland
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-07-28 · NWO 40&Over 4.0W Ray/Smith-PTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Smith
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-28 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W DAY Wittenmyer-PTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abby Burns
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-21 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W DAY Wittenmyer-PTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Kepp
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-20 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Gauld/Purk-PTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Watkins
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-19 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Gauld/Purk-PTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelley Randecker
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
100%
5W–0L · 70.6% of games
3.0
76.7%
23W–7L · 59.6% of games
3.5
68.5%
37W–17L · 57.4% of games
4.0
0%
0W–6L · 32.4% of games
5.5
83.3%
10W–2L · 63.9% of games
6.5
81.2%
26W–6L · 62.3% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
82.6%
19W–4L · 62.3% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
16W–8L · 55.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
62 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
60 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams