← Search

Jessica Lankford

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
SYLVANIA, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
120 matches · 61W–59L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history120 matches
L
2026-10-27 · NWO 6.5W Combo Tues McDougle/Lankford - Launchpad · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristi McDougle
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-5
L
2026-10-13 · NWO 6.5W Combo Tues McDougle/Lankford - Launchpad · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristi McDougle
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-3
L
2026-10-10 · NWO 7.5W Combo McDougle - Launchpad · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brittany Burnett
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-09 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W DAY Walerius/Dykhuis-Southview · #2 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-02 · NWO 40&Over 3.0W Glosser/Worth-Jermain · #1 Singles · 3.0 championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-08-01 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W DAY Walerius/Dykhuis-Southview · #2 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-01 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W DAY Walerius/Dykhuis-Southview · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brandi Walerius championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-30 · NWO 40&Over 3.0W Glosser/Worth-Jermain · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Drew Stiles
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-27 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W DAY Walerius/Dykhuis-Southview · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-07-23 · NWO 40&Over 3.0W Glosser/Worth-Jermain · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W DAY Zacharias/Minicozzi-Bedford · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-10 · NWO 40&Over 3.0W Glosser/Worth-Jermain · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Randi Walters
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
60%
15W–10L · 52.9% of games
3.0
57.6%
19W–14L · 51.4% of games
3.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 49.6% of games
5.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 51.3% of games
6.5
33.3%
6W–12L · 45.3% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 48.5% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
20 matches
#1 Singles
12%
14 matches
#2 Singles
6%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal