← Search

Brandi Walerius

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sylvania, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
177 matches · 106W–71L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history177 matches
L
2026-10-27 · NWO 6.5W Combo Tues McDougle/Lankford - Launchpad · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Molly O'Connell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-20 · NWO 6.5W Combo Tues McDougle/Lankford - Launchpad · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karen Johnson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-4, 0-1
L
2026-10-13 · NWO 6.5W Combo Tues McDougle/Lankford - Launchpad · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Molly O'Connell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-26 · NWO 7.5W Combo McDougle - Launchpad · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jill Halker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-09 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W DAY Walerius/Dykhuis-Southview · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Halker championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-08-08 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W DAY Walerius/Dykhuis-Southview · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Halker championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-02 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Zeiger/Passanante-SVC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brittany Burnett championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-02 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Zeiger/Passanante-SVC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brittany Burnett championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-01 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W DAY Walerius/Dykhuis-Southview · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brittany Burnett championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-08-01 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W DAY Walerius/Dykhuis-Southview · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Lankford championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-28 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W DAY Walerius/Dykhuis-Southview · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Dykhuis
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-27 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W DAY Walerius/Dykhuis-Southview · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Halker
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
75%
9W–3L · 62.3% of games
3.5
63.6%
56W–32L · 54.7% of games
5.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.4% of games
6.5
46.5%
20W–23L · 52.5% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
66.7%
10W–5L · 63.2% of games
7.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 47% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
87 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
36 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert